ECO2 Deliverable No D1.1 2013
DOI: 10.3289/eco2_d1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Report of Leakage Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our estimate for CH 4 leakage along hydrocarbon wells in the North Sea is based on the lower two measured leakage rates 20 and the assumption that wells poking through shallow gas pockets will leak, which is corroborated by observed ebullition of biogenic gas at wells 15/9-13 and 16/7-2, 20 as well as 15/9-11 and 15/9-16. 43 However, Vielstadte et al 20 also found leakage at well 16/4-2, where no shallow gas pockets could be imaged in the seismic data (Figure 2b, note that the spatial resolution of the seismic data is ∼10 m) but seismic turbidity may suggest the presence of gas in the vicinity of the well (see Figure 2b, 0.1−0.4 s two-way travel time (TWT)).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our estimate for CH 4 leakage along hydrocarbon wells in the North Sea is based on the lower two measured leakage rates 20 and the assumption that wells poking through shallow gas pockets will leak, which is corroborated by observed ebullition of biogenic gas at wells 15/9-13 and 16/7-2, 20 as well as 15/9-11 and 15/9-16. 43 However, Vielstadte et al 20 also found leakage at well 16/4-2, where no shallow gas pockets could be imaged in the seismic data (Figure 2b, note that the spatial resolution of the seismic data is ∼10 m) but seismic turbidity may suggest the presence of gas in the vicinity of the well (see Figure 2b, 0.1−0.4 s two-way travel time (TWT)).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%