1981
DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/64.2.432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Report of Committee E on Recommendations for Official Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pure CO 2 (99.99 vol %) was then introduced into the bottle at a flow rate of 500 sccm, controlled by an Airoboost mass flow controller. The CO 2 loading ( L CO 2 ) in the solution was determined using the weighing method, employing an electronic balance GL224I-1SCN with an accuracy of 0.1 mg, which is validated by the standard method of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) . To ensure measurement accuracy, all experiments were conducted three times, and the average values were used in this work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pure CO 2 (99.99 vol %) was then introduced into the bottle at a flow rate of 500 sccm, controlled by an Airoboost mass flow controller. The CO 2 loading ( L CO 2 ) in the solution was determined using the weighing method, employing an electronic balance GL224I-1SCN with an accuracy of 0.1 mg, which is validated by the standard method of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) . To ensure measurement accuracy, all experiments were conducted three times, and the average values were used in this work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of CO 2 in solvents was determined by measuring the volume of CO 2 gas released upon adding excessive acid (H 2 SO 4 , 25%). The methods used to determine the CO 2 loadings were validated against the standard method of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), with an average error of ±3% between the actual and measured results, confirming their validity. To ensure measurement accuracy, all experiments were conducted three times, and the average values were used in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 20 g sample fraction of each component was oven‐dried at 70°C until a constant weight was obtained. The oven‐dried material of each part of the plant was ground to pass through a 1‐mm sieve, and the N of the grain was determined using the micro‐Kjeldahl method (Helrich, 1990). The crude protein concentration was then calculated using the following formula: Crude0.16emproteinbadbreak=Nitrogengoodbreak×6.25$$\begin{equation}{\rm{Crude}}\,{\rm{protein}} = {\rm{Nitrogen}} \times {\rm{6}}{\rm{.25}}\end{equation}$$…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sugar beet leaf and protein concentrates from leaves were analyzed for total dry matter, ash, and protein 10 content in accordance with the standard procedures of the Official Association of Analytical Chemists 11 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein content of sugar beet leaves and protein concentrates from leaves were found by the Kjeldahl method 11 . Then, the protein yield was calculated from the grams of protein in protein concentrates in dry matter per gram of protein in sugar beet leaf in dry matter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%