2016
DOI: 10.5194/bg-2016-233-ac2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply

Abstract: Comment: Given the current focus on explaining the large spread in carbon cycle predictions in CMIP5 simulations, studies such as this manuscript help clarify potential drivers of differences. Furthermore, it is important to highlight how subtle differences in process or implementation can potentially lead to large differences in terrestrial carbon stocks. This

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 2 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?