1999
DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to the Commentaries on the Math-Fact Retrieval Hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be particularly true among high-achieving children because demanding mathematical tasks require more motivation and related effort than does the learning of basic skills. Another explanation is that because there is more variance in math performance among boys than among girls, it follows that among high-achieving pupils, boys are more likely to outperform girls (Geary, 1996; Royer, Tronsky, Marchant, & Jackson, 1999; Willingham & Cole, 1997). No sex differences were found, however, among the low-performing children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be particularly true among high-achieving children because demanding mathematical tasks require more motivation and related effort than does the learning of basic skills. Another explanation is that because there is more variance in math performance among boys than among girls, it follows that among high-achieving pupils, boys are more likely to outperform girls (Geary, 1996; Royer, Tronsky, Marchant, & Jackson, 1999; Willingham & Cole, 1997). No sex differences were found, however, among the low-performing children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%