superficial and polarized views of this increasingly recognized and potentially serious form of child abuse. Allison and Roberts provide a provocative and at times limited reevaluation that challenges our constructs of this putative syndrome. For the authors the diagnosis of Munchausen by Proxy syndrome (MBPS) conjures up a sinister image: a severely personality disordered mother, while ostensibly seeking medical treatment, surreptitiously induces illness in her defenceless child in order to gain attention from a caring, powerful, perhaps even loving, physician. The authors question the generally accepted research usually quoted to support the diagnostic validity of MBPS, claiming it is insubstantial and logically flawed. Allison and Roberts selectively review an idiosyncratic selection of the literature to conclude that the diagnosis of MBPS depends on weak diagnostic criteria, and wholly circular and self-justifying arguments that further disempower disadvantaged mothers and chronically ill children. The authors are academic philosophers at Stony Brook, New York. Their writings scrutinize aspects of the world of medicine, including the concept of disease and what may or may not constitute appropriate illness and healthcare-seeking behaviour. They have adopted a social-constructionist and at times feminist perspective of the apparent power imbalances between patients and physicians. This book emphasizes the plight of well-intentioned mothers, who may face unreasonable accusations of fabrication and falsification from doctors, who feel deskilled when they encounter chronic paediatric conditions that do not respond well to medical management. Allison and Roberts maintain that the medical and legal professions collude in their allegations against mothers who are being persecuted in a manner analogous to the witch-hunts of medieval Europe. They draw detailed comparisons with the medical misperception and mismanagement of 19th century 'hysterics' and argue coherently against early psychodynamic models of understanding abnormal illness behaviour which is supposedly motivated by secondary gains. The authors critically review the writings of Cheyne, Gavin, Brodie, Charcot and Freud. They elaborate on how the constructs of abnormal illness behaviour and particularly MSPB have evolved in response to dominant discourses that have developed within the principally male and to some extent self-serving culture of medicine. At times Allison and Roberts can appear to be engaged in a personal crusade against Schreier and Libow and their textbook about MBPS, 'Hurting for love'. There may well be some validity in their criticism of Schreier and Libow's definition of MBPS, which specifies that the mother's motivation is to engage in an ambivalent relationship with the physician, or any other powerful societal figure (Schreier, 1996). Unfortunately, Allison and Roberts present their views as original and fail to give reference to many other