2021
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1865745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to: regarding: ‘the risk of induced cancer and ischemic heart disease following low dose lung irradiation for COVID-19: estimation based on a virtual case’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2 In a response to our comments, 3 Arruda et al stated that they ignored the hormetic responses because the leading international authorities on radiation protection do not accept hormetic models. 4 Shuryak et al apparently have the same troubling opinion. Although Shuryak et al have cited Arruda et al, 2 they have not paid enough attention to their very low risk estimates for LDRT at doses ≤0.5 Gy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 2 In a response to our comments, 3 Arruda et al stated that they ignored the hormetic responses because the leading international authorities on radiation protection do not accept hormetic models. 4 Shuryak et al apparently have the same troubling opinion. Although Shuryak et al have cited Arruda et al, 2 they have not paid enough attention to their very low risk estimates for LDRT at doses ≤0.5 Gy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“… 2 In a response to our comments, 3 Arruda et al stated that they ignored the hormetic responses because the leading international authorities on radiation protection do not accept hormetic models. 4 Shuryak et al apparently have the same troubling opinion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%