2020
DOI: 10.5194/se-2020-86-ac2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to referee 2

Abstract: Thank you for your positive remarks and some insightful comments on the paper. We appreciate the time and effort that you have dedicated to our manuscript. We have evaluated your comments and our response is discussed and summarized below. The technical corrections are discussed per bullet in more detail. Your textual corrections on the manuscript are updated in the final revised version.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pooled results are reported for all the analyses. The F tests for regression model fits (i.e., pooled ∆ R 2 ) on the multiply imputed data were conducted according to the approach and the SPSS macro ( MI-MUL2 ) provided by Van Ginkel (2010 , 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pooled results are reported for all the analyses. The F tests for regression model fits (i.e., pooled ∆ R 2 ) on the multiply imputed data were conducted according to the approach and the SPSS macro ( MI-MUL2 ) provided by Van Ginkel (2010 , 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%