2013
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1307961110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to Price and Bird: No inconsistency between the date of gene flow from India and the Australian archaeological record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intriguingly this might fit with evidence of a Pama–Nyungan language expansion in Northern Australia during the Holocene period [ 99 ] or a possible human immigration from India [ 100 ]. However, these hypotheses are controversial [ 96 , 98 , 101 103 ]. Indeed, PCA analyses indicate that all dingoes are more closely related to South East Asian dogs than to European dogs ( Fig 7 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intriguingly this might fit with evidence of a Pama–Nyungan language expansion in Northern Australia during the Holocene period [ 99 ] or a possible human immigration from India [ 100 ]. However, these hypotheses are controversial [ 96 , 98 , 101 103 ]. Indeed, PCA analyses indicate that all dingoes are more closely related to South East Asian dogs than to European dogs ( Fig 7 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the estimated date of admixture coincides with the time of the introduction of dingo [ 95 ], the first appearance of microliths (small stone tools) [ 96 ], and other changes documented in the Australian archeological record. It is therefore possible that these changes in Australia were associated with the migration from India, although this remains a controversial issue [ 97 - 99 ].
Figure 5 Results of the PCA, ADMIXTURE, and TreeMix analyses, indicating gene flow from India to Australia.
…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%