2014
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to Mendez et al: the ‘extremely ancient’ chromosome that still isn’t

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, this requires that mutation and substitution rates could be equated. The recent availability of autosomal, genome-wide estimates of the de novo mutation rate [ 12 14 ] prompted some authors [ 4 , 11 ] to adopt it as a base to calculate a substitution rate for the Y-chromosome, with due adjustments.This operation is not free of assumptions (thoroughly discussed in the Supplemental text of Scozzari et al[ 4 ]) and is currently a subject of vivid debate [ 15 17 ]. Specifically, there are several unknowns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this requires that mutation and substitution rates could be equated. The recent availability of autosomal, genome-wide estimates of the de novo mutation rate [ 12 14 ] prompted some authors [ 4 , 11 ] to adopt it as a base to calculate a substitution rate for the Y-chromosome, with due adjustments.This operation is not free of assumptions (thoroughly discussed in the Supplemental text of Scozzari et al[ 4 ]) and is currently a subject of vivid debate [ 15 17 ]. Specifically, there are several unknowns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the calculations based on this Y lineage implied that the ancestor of the Y chromosome of all present-day men and the Y chromosome Mbo had lived in Africa 340,000 years ago [45]. This predates largely the date for the "mitochondrial Eve", the mother of all present-day maternal lineages, and the most ancient fossils of Homo sapiens.Even if the date is more likely to be closer to 208,000, as proposed by a later analysis [46] using a Y mutation rate in line with more recent calculations [39], this is still a surprising result. How can it be explained?…”
Section: Genetic Exchanges Between Archaic Populationsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In fact, there is recent evidence suggesting that natural selection is involved in the maintenance of genetic variation involving copy number variants [65]. This is an area where some controversy remains, following the discovery of a new lineage (haplogroup A00) in 2013, revisions of the estimated TMRCA have been suggested [66][67][68][69].…”
Section: Specific Particularities Of the Msy In Relation To Human Population Historymentioning
confidence: 99%