Reply to Dr Myers' Commentary on the Use of Automated Blood Pressure Machines in Office Blood Pressure Measurements

Hiremath, Swapnil; McCormick, Brendan; Ruzicka, Marcel

doi:10.1111/jch.12332

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

(23 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The letter of Hiremath and colleagues 1 provides an opportunity to clarify several aspects of automated office blood pressure (AOBP) measurement and to address the concerns they have raised. The basic principles of AOBP include multiple readings taken with a fully automated device with the patient resting quietly alone.…”

Section: To the Editormentioning

confidence: 99%

Eliminating the Human Factor in Office Blood Pressure Measurement

Myers

2014

J of Clinical Hypertension

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The letter of Hiremath and colleagues 1 provides an opportunity to clarify several aspects of automated office blood pressure (AOBP) measurement and to address the concerns they have raised. The basic principles of AOBP include multiple readings taken with a fully automated device with the patient resting quietly alone. As Hiremath and colleagues have noted, AOBP is now explicitly identified as an alternative to manual office blood pressure (MOBP) in various guidelines, including the British National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence [NICE] report, 2 which recommended that MOBP not be used to diagnose hypertension. Numerous studies have documented the superiority of AOBP over MOBP in terms of accuracy and validity, including the elimination of the white-coat effect.It is unfortunate that Hiremath and colleagues dismiss the evidence supporting the use of AOBP while defending the findings in their recent study 3 in an attempt to discredit AOBP. They make several claims that are invalid. They persist with their belief that an AOBP reading should be preceded by a period of rest, despite at least 10 studies reporting similar values for AOBP and awake ambulatory BP (AABP) without any rest before readings. 4 They quote the findings from a single study reported by Lalonde and colleagues at a scientific meeting to support their position. However, this study used the same sequential, before and after design to compare MOBP with AOBP readings and their respective relationship to the AABP. In both instances, AOBP was preceded by several MOBP readings and 5 minutes of rest. As expected, the mean AOBP values were lower than the AABP, in contrast to the 10 studies mentioned above. As stated in my commentary, when comparing two different methods of blood pressure (BP) measurement, the sequence of recording the readings should be randomized, otherwise the second readings-regardless of the technique usedwill tend to be lower.Hiremath and colleagues also incorrectly imply that inclusion of AOBP in various guidelines is accompanied by a recommendation for a 5-minute period of rest. They seem unaware that our own Canadian (Canadian Hypertension Education Program [CHEP]) guidelines since 2011 specifically state that there should be "no specified period of rest" before AOBP readings are taken. 5The statement by Hiremath and colleagues that I continue "to promote AOBP as a surrogate for daytime ABPM" is incorrect. None of the articles from our group has ever stated that AOBP can substitute (the dictionary meaning of "surrogate") for ABPM. As indicated in my commentary, "ambulatory BP. . .has a pre-eminent position in the guidelines" and ABPM is "considered to be a gold standard for predicting future cardiovascular risk in relation to BP status."Hiremath and colleagues also state that "it is curious that Dr Myers has chosen to ignore the wide limits of agreement between AOBP and ABPM." Given that I was the first person to describe the confidence limits of AOBP using Bland-Altman analysis and have reported this analysis for AO...

show abstract

Section: To the Editormentioning

confidence: 99%

Eliminating the Human Factor in Office Blood Pressure Measurement

Myers

2014

J of Clinical Hypertension

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Reply to Dr Myers' Commentary on the Use of Automated Blood Pressure Machines in Office Blood Pressure Measurements

Cited by 1 publication

References 15 publications

Eliminating the Human Factor in Office Blood Pressure Measurement

Eliminating the Human Factor in Office Blood Pressure Measurement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About