2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.96.098502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to “Comment on ‘Lattice gluon and ghost propagators and the strong coupling in pureSU(3)Yang-Mills theory: Finite lattice spacing and volume effects’ ”

Abstract: The quenched gluon and ghost propagator data published in [Duarte et al. Phys. Rev. D 94, 014502 (2016).] is reanalyzed following the suggestion of [Boucaud et al. Phys. Rev. D 96, 098501 (2017).] to resolve the differences between the infrared data of the simulations. Our results confirm that the procedure works well either for the gluon or for the ghost propagator but not for both propagators simultaneously as the observed deviations in the data follow opposite patterns. Definitive conclusions require impro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role played by the discretization artifacts, crucial for the extrapolation of results to the continuum limit and for the extraction of QCD parameters therefrom, was not fully understood from the analysis therein performed. Two following publications, a "Comment-to" [68] and its corresponding "Reply" [69], elaborated further on this issue, mainly in connection with the problem of the lattice scale setting, but failed to settle properly the question about continuum extrapolation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role played by the discretization artifacts, crucial for the extrapolation of results to the continuum limit and for the extraction of QCD parameters therefrom, was not fully understood from the analysis therein performed. Two following publications, a "Comment-to" [68] and its corresponding "Reply" [69], elaborated further on this issue, mainly in connection with the problem of the lattice scale setting, but failed to settle properly the question about continuum extrapolation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the above has been explicitly shown in [99,143,144], where a simple but effective remedy for correcting these deviations has been proposed: a scale resetting ā(β) = (1+δ)a(β)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuum physics requires E(p 2 ) = − p 2 H(p 2 ) and, assuming that this condition holds, F (p 2 ) and G(p 2 ) can be measured using Eqs. (37). The continuum tensor structure of the propagator requires also that F (p 2 ) = H(p 2 ) and, in this case, the two quasi-independent measures of F and H can be used to test how well the continuum basis describes the lattice data.…”
Section: B Special Kinematical Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%