2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to comment on: Failure of a new antivenom to treat Echis ocellatus snake bite in rural Ghana: the importance of quality surveillance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AV-C is produced using venom from the Indian saw-scaled viper ( Echis carinatus ) and marketed as an African antivenom despite a demonstrated lack of efficacy against African Echis species in both clinical and preclinical studies. 18,19 In 2008 a rural hospital in Ghana reported a 6-fold increase in mortality after switching from high-quality FAV-Afrique (FAV-A; Aventis Pasteur, Lyon, France) to the less expensive AV-C. 20 Any difference in cost was negated by the large amount of AV-C required during the study to compensate for its lower efficacy. More than half (56%) of all patients treated with AV-C required additional doses of antivenom compared to less than one quarter (22%) of those treated with FAV-A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AV-C is produced using venom from the Indian saw-scaled viper ( Echis carinatus ) and marketed as an African antivenom despite a demonstrated lack of efficacy against African Echis species in both clinical and preclinical studies. 18,19 In 2008 a rural hospital in Ghana reported a 6-fold increase in mortality after switching from high-quality FAV-Afrique (FAV-A; Aventis Pasteur, Lyon, France) to the less expensive AV-C. 20 Any difference in cost was negated by the large amount of AV-C required during the study to compensate for its lower efficacy. More than half (56%) of all patients treated with AV-C required additional doses of antivenom compared to less than one quarter (22%) of those treated with FAV-A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%