1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.362681
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Atomistic models of vacancy-mediated diffusion in silicon’ ’’ [J. Appl. Phys. 78, 2362 (1995)]

Abstract: Antoncik has criticized both the conclusions and elements of the modeling approach in a previously published article on dopant diffusion in silicon (S. T. Dunham and C. D. Wu [J. Appl. Phys. 78, 2362 (1995)]). As is shown in this reply, those criticisms are without merit and the alternative explanation proposed to explain the rapid diffusivity increase observed at high donor concentrations is based on an analysis which contains a series of critical errors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

2
27
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodology and parameters used here were given in a recent study, 27 which predicted the migration of clusters in Ge. In contrast to the assumption of Dunham and Wu, 39 we predict that the migration enthalpy barriers are significantly affected by the presence of different dopant atoms in Ge ͑see Table I͒. Furthermore, as discussed by Höhler et al, 41 oversized impurities in Ge prefer the split-V ͑or bond-centered͒ configuration, in which the impurity atom is surrounded by two semivacancies.…”
contrasting
confidence: 47%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The methodology and parameters used here were given in a recent study, 27 which predicted the migration of clusters in Ge. In contrast to the assumption of Dunham and Wu, 39 we predict that the migration enthalpy barriers are significantly affected by the presence of different dopant atoms in Ge ͑see Table I͒. Furthermore, as discussed by Höhler et al, 41 oversized impurities in Ge prefer the split-V ͑or bond-centered͒ configuration, in which the impurity atom is surrounded by two semivacancies.…”
contrasting
confidence: 47%
“…1 the step from ͑2͒ to ͑3͔͒ assumed by Dunham and Wu. 39 Interestingly, it can be observed from Table I that for the acceptor atoms ͑Al, Ga, and In͒, most second and third nearest neighbor interactions are repulsive, whereas Si repels a V even at the first nearest neighbor site. For the acceptor atoms, this indicates that a V will bind with the dopant, but when it moves away, it will likely break free.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations