2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.77.023102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to “Comment on ‘Analytical and numerical verification of the Nernst theorem for metals’ ”

Abstract: In this Reply to the preceding Comment of Klimchitskaya and Mostepanenko (cf. quant-ph/0703214), we summarize and maintain our position that the Drude dispersion relation when inserted in the Lifshitz formula gives a thermodynamically satisfactory description of the Casimir force, also in the limiting case when the relaxation frequency goes to zero (perfect crystals).

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, they pointed out that the Drude model combined with the Lifshitz formula violates the Nernst heat theorem for a perfect crystal lattice and is in contradiction with quantum statistical physics. Høye et al (2008) have argued that the Drude model combined with the Lifshitz formula is thermodynamically consistent in the case of a perfect crystal lattice also. To justify this statement they introduced the definition of a perfect lattice as the limiting case of a crystal lattice with nonzero residual relaxation γ res when γ res → 0.…”
Section: Real Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, they pointed out that the Drude model combined with the Lifshitz formula violates the Nernst heat theorem for a perfect crystal lattice and is in contradiction with quantum statistical physics. Høye et al (2008) have argued that the Drude model combined with the Lifshitz formula is thermodynamically consistent in the case of a perfect crystal lattice also. To justify this statement they introduced the definition of a perfect lattice as the limiting case of a crystal lattice with nonzero residual relaxation γ res when γ res → 0.…”
Section: Real Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the relaxation parameter turns out to be temperature-dependent and vanishes with vanishing temperature. The definition of a perfect lattice introduced by Høye et al (2008) violates lattice symmetry properties.…”
Section: Real Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8,9,10,11,12,13,14]). The zero-temperature contribution to the force, originating from quantum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field, is well understood.…”
Section: Problems Linked To Lifshitz's Theory For the Casimir Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of intensive studies on the Casimir effect, it is surprising that such an important problem as the temperature dependence of this effect is still unclear and is still an issue of lively discussion (see, e.g., Refs. [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]). The zero-temperature contribution to the force, originating from quantum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field, is well understood.…”
Section: Problems Linked To Lifshitz's Theory For the Casimir Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this limit, modes with frequencies above k B T /h 'freeze' to their ground state, do not contribute to the entropy, and a unique ground state for the system remains at T = 0. We have checked that the free energies at low T due to eddy currents alone and in the full Lifshitz theory [16,17] coincide in their first two terms (T 2 and T 5/2 ). Another scenario emerges with a T -dependent scattering rate when the ratio ξ L (T )/T vanishes as T → 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%