2020
DOI: 10.1134/s0021364020190108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to Comment on “Analysis of the Results of the Neutrino-4 Experiment on the Search for the Sterile Neutrino and Comparison with Results of Other Experiments” (JETP Letters 112, 199 (2020))

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of these experiments provide intriguing evidence in favor of the "3 + 1" scenario, although they appear to be in deep conflict with each other. In the two consecutive analyses of the Neutrino-4 data [88,89] (eprint version 7), the following allowed values for the masssquared splitting and mixing angle were obtained by using the so-called coherent data summation method: These results do not agree with the constraints based on the combined analysis of the MINOS, Daya Bay, and Bugey-3 data [94], and with the limits obtained in the recent SBL experiments DANSS [95][96][97], STEREO [51], NEOS [78] (see also [98], and PROSPECT [53]; this issue is now broadly discussed in the literature [99][100][101][102][103]. On the other hand, the 68% C.L.…”
Section: Extra Neutrinos or Miscalculated Flux?mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of these experiments provide intriguing evidence in favor of the "3 + 1" scenario, although they appear to be in deep conflict with each other. In the two consecutive analyses of the Neutrino-4 data [88,89] (eprint version 7), the following allowed values for the masssquared splitting and mixing angle were obtained by using the so-called coherent data summation method: These results do not agree with the constraints based on the combined analysis of the MINOS, Daya Bay, and Bugey-3 data [94], and with the limits obtained in the recent SBL experiments DANSS [95][96][97], STEREO [51], NEOS [78] (see also [98], and PROSPECT [53]; this issue is now broadly discussed in the literature [99][100][101][102][103]. On the other hand, the 68% C.L.…”
Section: Extra Neutrinos or Miscalculated Flux?mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We verified that the two representations of the Neutrino-4 data sample (with three and four points) yield the same (within the specified precision) result in our analysis and so we will no longer dwell on this issue. Recall that we do not take up the intriguing results of the spectral Neutrino-4 measurements, (see [99][100][101][102][103] for the comments and authors' responses) arbitrarily assuming that the integral event rate is not related to the sterile neutrinos.…”
Section: The Main Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Neutrino-4 experiment claimed an observation of ˜ oscillations to sterile neutrinos although the significance of the result was only 2.8 [15,16] and there were concerns about the validity of their analysis [17][18][19][20]. Neutrino-4 replied to these critical comments [21,22] and later agreed with two of them [23]. This resulted in the reduction of the significance of the result by about 0.5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Neutrino-4 experiment claimed an observation of νe oscillations to sterile neutrinos although the significance of the result was only 2.8σ [15,16] and there were concerns about the validity of their analysis [17,18,19,20]. Neutrino-4 replied to these critical comments [21,22] and later agreed with two of them [23]. This resulted in the reduction of the significance of the result by about 0.5σ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%