2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2012.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to comment on “Accordion vs. quantum tectonics: Insights into continental growth processes from the Paleozoic of eastern Gondwana”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to the “accordion tectonics” hypothesis endorsed in this study that supports a nearly continuous continental arc, that is, accretionary orogen undergoing periods of extension during slab retreat and compression during slab advance (Cawood et al, ; Collins, ). For our purposes, we interpret our data within the model of accretionary orogenesis because it has been widely applied to zircon Hf isotope data sets along the paleo‐Pacific margin of Gondwana (e.g., Kemp et al, ; Li et al, ; Pepper et al, ; Phillips et al, ; Rey et al, ), and there remains no consensus on the appropriate tectonic model for the evolution of the margin (Aitchison & Buckman, ; Fergusson, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to the “accordion tectonics” hypothesis endorsed in this study that supports a nearly continuous continental arc, that is, accretionary orogen undergoing periods of extension during slab retreat and compression during slab advance (Cawood et al, ; Collins, ). For our purposes, we interpret our data within the model of accretionary orogenesis because it has been widely applied to zircon Hf isotope data sets along the paleo‐Pacific margin of Gondwana (e.g., Kemp et al, ; Li et al, ; Pepper et al, ; Phillips et al, ; Rey et al, ), and there remains no consensus on the appropriate tectonic model for the evolution of the margin (Aitchison & Buckman, ; Fergusson, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%