India-Asia collision and subsequent progressive convergence not only led to the closure of the Neo-Tethys Ocean, but also produced the impressive and still active Himalayan-Tibetan orogen (Yin & Harrison, 2000). Those geological events have had a long-term influence on Cenozoic topography, biogeography, and global climate change (Kent & Muttoni, 2008;Raymo & Ruddiman, 1992;van Hinsbergen & Boschman, 2019). A full understanding of when, where and how India collided with Asia is a key parameter in the evolutionary history of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen and global climate change (Hu et al., 2016). However, there are large uncertainties in the timing of the India-Asia collision; estimates range from as young as ∼34 Ma (Aitchison et al., 2007) to as old as ∼70 Ma (Yin & Harrison, 2000), with most researchers preferring a collisional age of ∼50-55 Ma (Lippert et al., 2014;Najman et al., 2010;Zhu et al., 2015). The differences between these estimates arise not only from different collisional processes, but also from variable estimates of the size of Greater India.The traditional view is that India collided directly with Asia along the Indus-Tsangpo suture zone (ITSZ) (Yin & Harrison, 2000), although Roy (1976) previously proposed that the Tethyan Himalaya (TH), a possible microcontinent, collided with Asia first, followed by collision of the Indian craton with the TH. This dual-collision model has not been generally accepted by geologists because of the lack of supporting data.