The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1029/2007gl032432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to comment by H. J. Hendricks Franssen on “An unexpected pattern of distinct weekly periodicities in climatological variables in Germany”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also apparent weekly cycles at urban and rural stations, which is in agreement with Forster and Solomon (2003). It suggests that the weekend effect in DTR in the TP cannot be explained completely by microclimate effects, and seems not solely a local phenomenon, although it could be local in origin from the interaction between aerosols and meteorological variables, while uncertainties still exist (Bäumer 2008, Bäumer and Vogel 2007, Forster and Solomon 2003, Gong et al 2006, Sanchez-Lorenzo et al 2008. There is also an opposite signal weekend effect between autumn/summer (negative) and winter/spring (positive) in the TP, which is possibly caused by different atmospheric circulation patterns and by the direct and indirect effects of aerosols on radiation, cloud, precipitation, and so on (Gong et al 2006, Sanchez-Lorenzo et al 2008.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are also apparent weekly cycles at urban and rural stations, which is in agreement with Forster and Solomon (2003). It suggests that the weekend effect in DTR in the TP cannot be explained completely by microclimate effects, and seems not solely a local phenomenon, although it could be local in origin from the interaction between aerosols and meteorological variables, while uncertainties still exist (Bäumer 2008, Bäumer and Vogel 2007, Forster and Solomon 2003, Gong et al 2006, Sanchez-Lorenzo et al 2008. There is also an opposite signal weekend effect between autumn/summer (negative) and winter/spring (positive) in the TP, which is possibly caused by different atmospheric circulation patterns and by the direct and indirect effects of aerosols on radiation, cloud, precipitation, and so on (Gong et al 2006, Sanchez-Lorenzo et al 2008.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…There exists a weekend effect in DTR in different regions of the world, such as Canada, Mexico, eastern China and Japan, and aerosol-cloud interactions are the most likely cause (Forster and Solomon 2003). In Germany, significant weekly periodicities are identified, and the interaction of a weekly aerosol cycles, supported by the existence of a significant weekly cycle in the aerosol optical thickness over the country and adjacent areas , and the dynamics of the atmosphere could possibly help to explain such phenomena (Bäumer andVogel 2007, Laux andKunstmann 2008). In Spain, the weekly cycles in winter may be related to changes in the atmospheric circulation over Western Europe, which may be due to some indirect effect of anthropogenic aerosols (Sanchez-Lorenzo et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In a comment to the previous paper, Hendricks Franssen [2008], however, affirmed that the weekly cycles observed in Germany are random since they are not consistent with results obtained with long‐term series of sunshine duration and precipitation variables in two Swiss stations. The former authors have responded [ Bäumer and Vogel , 2008] arguing that if it is assumed that the weekly cycle is induced by anthropogenic activities, then it is understandable not to detect these periodicities over the last centuries and contrarily it is more likely that the weekly cycle has become more intense since the second half of the 20th century. Similarly, Gong et al [2006] detected in China that the weekly cycle is clearer since the late 1970s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schultz et al (2007) analyze a large set of observations from 219 stations in the United States to reach the opposite conclusion, that precipitation amounts and frequency do not exhibit any dependence on the day of the week. In Europe, Bä umer and Vogel (2007) analyze 12 stations in Germany to find significant departures from a homogeneous distribution of rainfall during the week. Franssen (2007) considers rainfall observations from two stations in Switzerland to refute the conclusions by Bäumer and Vogel (2007) and to show that random fluctuations can account for observed deviations from homogeneity during the week.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%