2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00017.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to comment by F. H. Cornet on 'Large-scale in situ permeability tensor of rocks from induced microseismicity'

Abstract: S U M M A RYWe propose an approach for estimating the permeability tensor using seismic emission induced by borehole hydraulic tests or by a £uid injection of an arbitrary nature. This approach provides a single estimation of the permeability tensor for the complete heterogeneous rock volume where the seismic emission was recorded. The approach is an extension of the method proposed by Shapiro et al. (1997) for the isotropic case. It is based on the hypothesis that the triggering front of the hydraulic-induced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
104
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatiotemporal evolution of the triggering front depends on different parameters, including stress, injection rate, diffusivity and rock properties (e.g., friction coefficient). For example, an elliptical shape of the induced seismic cloud can be caused by the anisotropy of hydraulic diffusivity (Shapiro et al, 1997(Shapiro et al, , 1999, or by an anisotropic stress tensor (Schoenball et al, 2010). Due to poroelastic effects, it is impossible to distinguish between the two types of anisotropy from geothermal seismicity alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatiotemporal evolution of the triggering front depends on different parameters, including stress, injection rate, diffusivity and rock properties (e.g., friction coefficient). For example, an elliptical shape of the induced seismic cloud can be caused by the anisotropy of hydraulic diffusivity (Shapiro et al, 1997(Shapiro et al, , 1999, or by an anisotropic stress tensor (Schoenball et al, 2010). Due to poroelastic effects, it is impossible to distinguish between the two types of anisotropy from geothermal seismicity alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During all these stimulations, induced seismicity has been extensively studied (Charléty et al 2007;Cuenot et al 2008). For all of them, fluid pressure increase has been considered as the main source of seismicity initiation (Shapiro et al 1999). The 1993 stimulation is certainly the first stimulation for which a precise influence of the fluid pressure has been demonstrated (Cornet et al 1997;Cornet et al 2007).…”
Section: Fluid-induced Seismicity At Soultz-sous-forêtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ledésert et al 1996;Aquilina et al 1997) and as a heat-exchanger, the majority of studies aimed at assessing or quantifying the permeability at the geothermal sites at Soultz-sous-Forêts and Rittershoffen, for example, have focussed on the granite basement (e.g. Genter and Traineau 1996;Shapiro et al 1999;Sausse et al 2006;Dezayes et al 2010;Ledésert et al 2010;Vogt et al 2012a, b;Vidal et al 2017). Few studies, especially laboratory studies that offer values of porosity and permeability, have targeted the overlying Permo-Triassic sedimentary units (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%