2015
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply: Neural detection of complex sound sequences or of statistical regularities in the absence of consciousness?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study shows that an improvement in auditory discrimination over the first 2 days of coma is predictive of postanoxic patients' chances of awakening, extending our previous findings based on 30 patients 21 to 94 comatose patients (see also Tzovara et al 41,42 ). The above-chance level predictive value of the proposed test for awakening (ie, 82% when including all EEG recordings or 93% when excluding patients with epileptiform EEG activity) should encourage its implementation in clinical practice, to complement other available tests, which are mainly predictive of poor outcome.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study shows that an improvement in auditory discrimination over the first 2 days of coma is predictive of postanoxic patients' chances of awakening, extending our previous findings based on 30 patients 21 to 94 comatose patients (see also Tzovara et al 41,42 ). The above-chance level predictive value of the proposed test for awakening (ie, 82% when including all EEG recordings or 93% when excluding patients with epileptiform EEG activity) should encourage its implementation in clinical practice, to complement other available tests, which are mainly predictive of poor outcome.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This study shows that an improvement in auditory discrimination over the first 2 days of coma is predictive of postanoxic patients' chances of awakening, extending our previous findings based on 30 patients 21 to 94 comatose patients (see also Tzovara et al 41,42 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Recent efforts to assess consciousness using neurophysiological data have been limited by the need to interpret data from unresponsive patients by a comparison to healthy controls (Bekinschtein et al, 2009 ; Cruse et al, 2011 ; Goldfine et al, 2012 ; Naccache et al, 2015 ; Tzovara et al, 2015a , b ). The challenges inherent in interpreting the EEG of unresponsive patients are clearly illustrated in this patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning techniques that classify neurophysiological patterns in response to motor imagery commands have been proposed as a means of distinguishing patients with covert consciousness from those with UWS (Cruse et al, 2011 ). However, the ability of these methods to detect covert consciousness has been critiqued on the basis of technical or statistical issues (King et al, 2011 ; Goldfine et al, 2012 ; Naccache et al, 2015 ; Tzovara et al, 2015a , b ). Another issue with current approaches is that neural markers must be compared to those of healthy controls using a between-subject study design, and interpretation of the functional significance of their presence or absence can be controversial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this clinical population, electrophysiological responses to auditory stimuli have been extensively investigated through oddball paradigms allowing to explore the so called mismatch negativity component (MMN) which is typically identified in less than half of the tested patients (Fischer et al, 2004(Fischer et al, , 2000Kotchoubey et al, 2005;Naccache et al, 2005). In more complex auditory paradigms (see for complete paradigm description and related discussion (Bekinschtein et al, 2009a;Faugeras et al, 2012Faugeras et al, , 2011King et al, 2013;Naccache et al, 2015;Tzovara et al, 2015b)), multivariate decoding algorithm showed significant classification performance in response to auditory global deviants in 14% of vegetative state patients (King et al, 2013) and in 25% of recordings in comatose patients (Tzovara et al, 2015a). Evidence of semantic discrimination was also found in acute coma, with 14/38 recordings (37%) showing distinct EEG activity in response to human vs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%