2021
DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001937.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply by Authors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines support the option of AS in cases of low or intermediate risk for prostate cancer, the bigger question is whether the riskbenefit profile in these patients necessitates treatment with enzalutamide or another drug. A recent meta-analysis of more than 6700 men showed a 99.8 cancer-specific survival at 6.7 years of follow up, with a 0.4% rate of systemic progression, 4 values that are similar to other AS cohorts. Generally, these men will do well if followed closely.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…While the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines support the option of AS in cases of low or intermediate risk for prostate cancer, the bigger question is whether the riskbenefit profile in these patients necessitates treatment with enzalutamide or another drug. A recent meta-analysis of more than 6700 men showed a 99.8 cancer-specific survival at 6.7 years of follow up, with a 0.4% rate of systemic progression, 4 values that are similar to other AS cohorts. Generally, these men will do well if followed closely.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%