2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply

Abstract: We greatly appreciate Drs Padhy and Rao's comments regarding our study. 1 We would like to address the criticisms they raised as follows.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Macular GCA has supported improved evaluations of glaucoma when compared with RNFL analysis and has demonstrated good reproducibility in GCIPL measurements [6][7][8]. Macular inner retinal layer/ GCIPL thickness has been recognized as a sensitive indicator for the assessment of optic nerve damage, especially in glaucoma [8], optic neuritis, and ischemic optic neuropathy [8][9][10][11]. The assessment of GCIPL damage may be a useful adjunct for distinguishing compressive optic neuropathy from glaucomatous optic neuropathy when the results of optic disc and visual field examinations are inconclusive [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macular GCA has supported improved evaluations of glaucoma when compared with RNFL analysis and has demonstrated good reproducibility in GCIPL measurements [6][7][8]. Macular inner retinal layer/ GCIPL thickness has been recognized as a sensitive indicator for the assessment of optic nerve damage, especially in glaucoma [8], optic neuritis, and ischemic optic neuropathy [8][9][10][11]. The assessment of GCIPL damage may be a useful adjunct for distinguishing compressive optic neuropathy from glaucomatous optic neuropathy when the results of optic disc and visual field examinations are inconclusive [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%