2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replication and extension of the dual pathway model of disordered eating: The role of fear of negative evaluation, suggestibility, rumination, and self-compassion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most existing research has linked fear of negative evaluation to symptoms of body dissatisfaction and weight/shape concerns, rather than behavioral symptoms of eating disorders (Maraldo, Zhou, Dowling, & Vader Wal, ; Utschig et al, ). Thus, it is unclear whether fear of negative evaluation is associated with eating disorders in general, or whether it is associated specifically with eating disorders diagnostically characterized by weight/shape concerns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most existing research has linked fear of negative evaluation to symptoms of body dissatisfaction and weight/shape concerns, rather than behavioral symptoms of eating disorders (Maraldo, Zhou, Dowling, & Vader Wal, ; Utschig et al, ). Thus, it is unclear whether fear of negative evaluation is associated with eating disorders in general, or whether it is associated specifically with eating disorders diagnostically characterized by weight/shape concerns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support for the DPM has been provided by a number of cross‐sectional studies (e.g., Duemm, Adams, & Keating, ; Evans, Tovée, Boothroyd, & Drewett, ; Girard, Chabrol, & Rodgers, ; Hutchinson, Rapee, & Taylor, ; Maraldo, Zhou, Dowling, & Vander Wal, ; Mason & Lewis, ; Ouwens, van Strien, van Leeuwe, & van der Staak, ; Ruisoto et al, ; Stice et al, ; van Strien, Engels, van Leeuwe, & Snoek, ; Welsh & King, ; Womble et al, ), with the model found to account for 9% (van Strien et al, ) to 71% (Stice et al, ) of the variance in disordered eating symptoms. Possible reasons for such variation in findings may be due to differences in the operationalization of disordered eating symptoms (e.g., overall disordered eating symptoms [Evans et al, ] opposed to binge‐eating symptoms [van Strien et al, ], as well as differences in the variables that have been included/omitted from the models being tested (see below for further discussion).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the mYFAS, the wording of the symptom Impact activities clearly refers to the negative emotional experience associated with the overconsumption (i.e., « I have spent time dealing with negative feelings from overeating certain food ») and the fact that it is frequently endorsed by the obese group is consistent with their high levels of depression. This symptom may be related to ruminative thinking, which is a cognitive process that has been associated with the severity of eating disorders symptomatology in both clinical and non-clinical populations [ 66 ] and may lead to EE [ 67 ]. Moreover, ruminative thinking has been found to impair cognitive flexibility and decision making, which are processes that have been found to be impaired in obese individuals [ 6 , 68 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%