2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.10.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replicating and resolving wetting and adhesion characteristics of a Rose petal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They mimicked the microstructure of the leave using soft lithography techniques and demonstrated an enhancement of 230% in water-harvesting on this surface. Ghosh et al 18 investigated wetting behavior and adhesion characteristics of a rose petal and resolved the liquid-substrate contact region using in-situ atomic force microscopy and confocal microscopy. They reported the Cassie impregnating wetting state on the rose petal, which does not let droplet to roll off from the surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They mimicked the microstructure of the leave using soft lithography techniques and demonstrated an enhancement of 230% in water-harvesting on this surface. Ghosh et al 18 investigated wetting behavior and adhesion characteristics of a rose petal and resolved the liquid-substrate contact region using in-situ atomic force microscopy and confocal microscopy. They reported the Cassie impregnating wetting state on the rose petal, which does not let droplet to roll off from the surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pertinent question to ask at this point is why a water drop sticks on patterned ZnO NR array fabricated with larger d D . To answer this question, we draw the attention toward a recent paper by Ghosh et al, where the stickiness on a surface that is in Cassie state and entrapped air has been correlated to the curvature of the liquid–air interface over each pit . They attributed the stickiness on the negative replica of a rose petal to concave shape of the water meniscus over each pits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, none of these articles except the one by Gong et al could demonstrate sliding of a water drop on the ZnO covered surfaces, which is essential for achieving self‐cleaning behavior, despite exhibiting tremendously high θ*(>160°) in many cases. On the other hand, Li et al have shown that a dense ZnO NR array–covered surface exhibits sticky hydrophobicity, similar to that observed on a rose petal, which limits their practical application as superhydrophobic coatings. Afsal and Chen could even turn a fresh lotus leaf in to a sticky surface by growing a dense array of ZnO NR on it .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Surfaces with controllable wetting properties are of great potential in downstream applications such as water harvesting, [ 1,2 ] self‐cleaning, [ 3–5 ] surface coating, [ 6,7 ] adhesion [ 8–10 ] and microfluidic devices. [ 11–14 ] One strategy to facilitate controllable surface wetting is to develop surface topographies, [ 15–17 ] thereby enabling a desired liquid/solid interaction.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%