2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-020-01227-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replicability, Repeatability, and Long-term Reproducibility of Cerebellar Morphometry

Abstract: To identify robust and reproducible methods of cerebellar morphometry that can be used in future large-scale structural MRI studies, we investigated the replicability, repeatability, and long-term reproducibility of three fully automated software tools: FreeSurfer, CEREbellum Segmentation (CERES), and automatic cerebellum anatomical parcellation using U-Net with locally constrained optimization (ACAPULCO). Replicability was defined as computational replicability, determined by comparing two analyses of the sam… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a larger replication study we recommend to cross-validate effects with different, well-established analysis approaches. The reproducibility of these analysis approaches should be investigated as recommended previously ( Sörös et al, 2021 ). One way to test the repeatability of the experiment and the analysis is to acquire two runs of the same paradigm and to compare the average of single runs before performing the grand average of all runs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a larger replication study we recommend to cross-validate effects with different, well-established analysis approaches. The reproducibility of these analysis approaches should be investigated as recommended previously ( Sörös et al, 2021 ). One way to test the repeatability of the experiment and the analysis is to acquire two runs of the same paradigm and to compare the average of single runs before performing the grand average of all runs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined volume of the total cerebellum, corpus medullare, 5 vermal regions, and 11 lateralized lobules (left-right averaged), for a total of 18 cerebellar ROIs. We also conducted analyses for the subset of participants with longitudinal data (2 time points) through ACAPULCO version 0.3.0, further optimized for longitudinal analysis …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also conducted analyses for the subset of participants with longitudinal data (2 time points) through ACAPULCO version 0.3.0, further optimized for longitudinal analysis. 4,45 DTI data for 28 ROIs were processed as detailed in our previous publication. 27 Briefly, we used the ENIGMA-DTI pipeline 46 , a modified tract-based spatial statistics approach 47 resulting in FA and other metrics averaged within ROIs from the Johns Hopkins University atlas.…”
Section: Image Acquisition Processing and Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain morphometry (structural imaging) will be performed using FreeSurfer [ 68 , 69 ] to determine brain total volume, total white matter volume and total grey matter volume. Cerebellum morphometry, performed using ACAPULCO [ 70 ], to determine the total cerebellar volume while SUIT [ 71 ] will be used to calculate the volume of left and right cerebellar peduncles. Brain DTI data will be analysed using FMRIB Software Library (FSL) [ 69 , 72 ] to determine the fractional anisotropy (FAn) and mean, axial and radial diffusivity (MD, AD, RD) of the left and right SCP.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%