We apply the recently developed replica exchange with solute tempering (REST) to three large solvated peptide systems: an α-helix, a β-hairpin, and a TrpCage, with these peptides defined as the "central group". We find that our original implementation of REST is not always more efficient than the replica exchange method (REM). Specifically, we find that exchanges between folded (F) and unfolded (U) conformations with vastly different structural energies are greatly reduced by the nonappearance of the water self-interaction energy in the replica exchange acceptance probabilities. REST, however, is expected to remain useful for a large class of systems for which the energy gap between the two states is not large, such as weakly bound protein-ligand complexes. Alternatively, a shell of water molecules can be incorporated into the central group, as discussed in the original paper.The replica exchange method (REM) has become very popular in the sampling of biomolecular systems. [1][2][3][4][5][6] However, the REM is restricted to relatively small systems, since the required number of replicas scales as O(f 1/2 ), where f is the number of degrees of freedom in the system. 7 To overcome this problem, we recently introduced replica exchange with solute tempering (REST) 8 for all-atom simulations in explicit water. In our original study, we tested REST on an alanine dipeptide dissolved in explicit water, a system with about 1500 atoms, and suggested that the required number of replicas now scales as O(f p 1/2 ), where f p is the number of degrees of freedom in the central group. In addition, we suggested that the speedup versus the REM, in terms of converging to the correct underlying distribution, is . In the current study, we broaden the application of REST to three large solvated peptide systems (α-helix, β-hairpin, and TrpCage) to offer an assessment of the efficiency of REST.Imposing detailed balance on the standard temperature replica exchange (REM) 1,2 operation results in the acceptance criterion , and E(X n ) is the potential energy of the system for the nth replica with configuration X n . For a protein system, the energy is composed of three terms:where E pp , E pw , and E ww are, respectively, the internal energy of the protein, the interaction energy between the protein and water, and the self-interaction energy of the water molecules. Properly solvating a protein system typically requires several thousand water molecules; hence, the self-interaction between the water molecules usually vastly dominates the other terms, that is, |E pp |, |E pw | ≪ |E ww |.The main disadvantage of the REM is that the system size causes the required number of replicas to increase rapidly, 7 roughly as O(f 1/2 ), where f is the number of degrees of freedom in the system. However, the presence of the water self-interaction energy, E ww , has two previously underappreciated benefits: (i) Changes in E pw are partially compensated by opposite changes in E ww , since both the magnitude of E pw and the number of water molecul...