2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41583-022-00620-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replay, the default mode network and the cascaded memory systems model

Abstract: The replay of patterns of activity related to past experiences and memories is a striking manifestation of brain spontaneous activity. So is the coherent activation of sets of brain areas during rest, in particular, the default mode network (DMN). We propose that these two phenomena are strongly intertwined: their potential functions overlap, encompassing the reinstatement, reprocessing, and consolidation of memories, and the simulation of potential outcomes of actions. In our cascaded memory systems model, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 188 publications
(230 reference statements)
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial learning elicited greater hippocampal-iLOC connectivity during post-initial-learning rest, which might reflect a possible increase in neural excitability of this circuit. Since neuronal excitability in the hippocampal-neocortical circuitry prior to encoding is recognized to modulate subsequent allocation and integration of newly acquired information into long-term memory ( Josselyn and Frankland, 2018 ; Kaefer et al, 2022 ; Schlichting and Frankland, 2017 ; van Dongen et al, 2011 ; Yoo et al, 2012 ), we thus speculate that greater hippocampal-iLOC connectivity might provide a preparatory state to allocate new information into existing memory traces during emotional learning and thus contribute to emotion-charged retroactive memory benefit. Besides, neural circuits activated by emotional learning exhibit persistent activity and also alter a series of systems-level interactions during post-emotional-learning rest ( de Voogd et al, 2016 ; Hermans et al, 2017 ; Murty et al, 2017 ), including hippocampal connectivity with aPFC, mPFC, PCC, and IPL observed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initial learning elicited greater hippocampal-iLOC connectivity during post-initial-learning rest, which might reflect a possible increase in neural excitability of this circuit. Since neuronal excitability in the hippocampal-neocortical circuitry prior to encoding is recognized to modulate subsequent allocation and integration of newly acquired information into long-term memory ( Josselyn and Frankland, 2018 ; Kaefer et al, 2022 ; Schlichting and Frankland, 2017 ; van Dongen et al, 2011 ; Yoo et al, 2012 ), we thus speculate that greater hippocampal-iLOC connectivity might provide a preparatory state to allocate new information into existing memory traces during emotional learning and thus contribute to emotion-charged retroactive memory benefit. Besides, neural circuits activated by emotional learning exhibit persistent activity and also alter a series of systems-level interactions during post-emotional-learning rest ( de Voogd et al, 2016 ; Hermans et al, 2017 ; Murty et al, 2017 ), including hippocampal connectivity with aPFC, mPFC, PCC, and IPL observed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Beyond online encoding, offline processes at awake rest and sleep also contribute to emotional memory benefit, most likely involving reconfiguration of hippocampal functional connectivity with distributed neocortical networks ( de Voogd et al, 2016 ; Schlichting and Frankland, 2017 ; Tambini et al, 2010 ). Recent studies have demonstrated that neural engagement, for instance, excitable hippocampal-neocortical coordinated interactions prior to encoding could affect the allocation of new information into specific neural populations and form a preparatory network for igniting reactivation or replay cascades to support memory integration ( Josselyn and Frankland, 2018 ; Kaefer et al, 2022 ; Schlichting and Frankland, 2017 ; van Dongen et al, 2011 ). Thus, it is possible that an excitable brain state at pre-emotional-encoding rest might modulate subsequent emotional memory integration and predict memory performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that RSPv is not tonically hyperactive but has exaggerated responses when activated, consistent with impaired feedforward inhibitory input from CA1 (Yamawaki e t al., 2019; Opalka et al, 2020). Further work is required to test the hypothesis that disruption in the balance of excitation and inhibition (Palop and Mucke, 2016) may be restricted to brain states or events (Kaefer et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies reveal hippocampal involvement in the default mode network activity. default mode network may mediate interactions between the hippocampus and the neocortex in memory formation and replay [100].…”
Section: Predominant Hyperconnectivity Of Low-frequency Oscillations ...mentioning
confidence: 99%