2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replacing traditional materials with polymeric materials in solar thermosiphon systems – Case study on pros and cons based on a total cost accounting approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The operational cost rate ( Z op ) and penalty cost of CO 2 emissions ( Z pen ) are determined by Equations () and (), respectively. Zop=WtotalCeletop, ${Z}_{\mathrm{op}}={W}_{\mathrm{total}}{C}_{\mathrm{ele}}{t}_{\mathrm{op}},$ Zpen=CCO2mCO2, ${Z}_{\mathrm{pen}}={C}_{C{O}_{2}}{m}_{C{O}_{2}},$where Cele ${C}_{\mathrm{ele}}$ is electricity price, and CCO2 ${C}_{C{O}_{2}}$ is the penalty tax of unit CO 2 emission (0.22$/kg) 23 …”
Section: System Description and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The operational cost rate ( Z op ) and penalty cost of CO 2 emissions ( Z pen ) are determined by Equations () and (), respectively. Zop=WtotalCeletop, ${Z}_{\mathrm{op}}={W}_{\mathrm{total}}{C}_{\mathrm{ele}}{t}_{\mathrm{op}},$ Zpen=CCO2mCO2, ${Z}_{\mathrm{pen}}={C}_{C{O}_{2}}{m}_{C{O}_{2}},$where Cele ${C}_{\mathrm{ele}}$ is electricity price, and CCO2 ${C}_{C{O}_{2}}$ is the penalty tax of unit CO 2 emission (0.22$/kg) 23 …”
Section: System Description and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where C ele is electricity price, and C CO 2 is the penalty tax of unit CO 2 emission (0.22$/kg). 23…”
Section: Economic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Michaelides et al [6] studied, different configurations of solar water heating systems, especially the under meteorological and socio-economic conditions of Cyprus, using different load profiles where the results showed that the solar fraction balanced between 89 and 63% depending on the consumption pattern studied (low and high). Moreover, Carlsson et al [7] studied the thermosyphon system by replacing the traditional materials with polymeric ones, in order to compare the thermal, and financial performances. It was found that the total energy costs could be reduced considerably using the polymeric material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of polymers for major components of solar thermal systems has been investigated with the focus on the aging behavior of these materials [1][2][3][4]. In fully polymeric solar thermal collectors many different polymers are used in the same collector [5][6][7][8][9]. During operation the polymeric materials are repeatedly and for a long period of time exposed to temperatures above 120 � C. Since normally the service life time of solar thermal systems is expected to be at least 20 years the materials developed for such applications are individually tested for aging effects by standard testing methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%