2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replacing tracheostomy with overnight intubation to manage the airway in head and neck oncology patients: towards an improved recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
44
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7,8,14 LOS was also longer in Ireland compared with that observed in specialist centers in the United Kingdom. 15,16 LOS in Ireland was similar to that observed in 2 specialist center studies from France. 17,18 Relative to the United States, longer LOS in Ireland may reflect U.S. insurers exercising greater control of LOS than was the case in public hospitals in Ireland.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,8,14 LOS was also longer in Ireland compared with that observed in specialist centers in the United Kingdom. 15,16 LOS in Ireland was similar to that observed in 2 specialist center studies from France. 17,18 Relative to the United States, longer LOS in Ireland may reflect U.S. insurers exercising greater control of LOS than was the case in public hospitals in Ireland.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…27 Tracheostomy has been reported to increase the risk of chest infection after HNC surgery. 15,28,29 Some advocate intubation over tracheostomy as a safer option, 15 whereas some others see tracheostomy as being essentially eventfree, except where neoadjuvant radiotherapy is adminstered. 30 Our data show that tracheostomy was frequently used after more extensive procedures to secure the airway, as might be expected.…”
Section: Month 2015mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in line with those of a recent study by Coyle et al performed in 2013 that also showed no long-term complications associated with tracheostomies. 11 Coyle et al suggested that tracheostomies should not be used as a routine procedure if a less invasive alternative is possible, e.g., overnight intubation, since the use of tracheostomies in their study prolonged the hospital stay and therefore costs. Although a tracheostomy is a relatively safe procedure, we also believe that its use should be limited to cases where there is a significant risk to the airway and if extubation may not be possible for the first 3 days postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[2][3][4][5][6] We know of no universally accepted algorithm or scoring system to help clinicians choose the most appropriate method of managing the airway, 7,8 but reported evidence suggests that patients who do not have a tracheostomy recover faster and have a shorter stay in hospital than those who do. 5,[9][10][11] Restricting the use of tracheostomy to selected cases has also become an important part of some ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) programmes. 12 patients who have had a tracheostomy and those who have not because of the diverse range of coexisting conditions and the different operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 patients who have had a tracheostomy and those who have not because of the diverse range of coexisting conditions and the different operations. 10,13 At the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) Unit at St George's Hospital, London, UK, tracheostomy is done only in selected patients who have free-flap reconstruction. We retrospectively audited the postoperative management of the airway (tracheostomy or delayed extubation) in these patients, and reviewed the cases that required a secondary or delayed tracheostomy, and those with serious complications related to the procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%