2023
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replacement of the illegitimate name Pleomorpha daqingensis (Wang et al. 2017) Montero-Calasanz et al. 2023 with the oldest legitimate name Geodermatophilus daqingensis Wang et al. 2017 and proposal to attribute this species to Petropleomorpha daqingensis (Wang et al. 2017) Li 2023 comb. nov.

Meng-Syun Li

Abstract: The prokaryotic generic name Pleomorpha Montero-Calasanz et al. 2023 should be considered illegitimate for being a later homonym of the insect generic name Pleomorpha Saunders 1847, which contravenes Principle 2 and Rule 51b(5) of the 2022 Prokaryotic Code. The name Pleomorpha daqingensis Montero-Calasanz et al. 2023 is therefore illegitimate, and a proposal of a replacement name must be made. The author herein proposes to replace it with the oldest legitimate name … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, according to Rule 54 the illegitimacy of Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) [2,3] could be resolved by proposing new combinations for all species currently placed in the genus for which alternative validly published and legitimate names are not yet available [10]. There are several recently published examples of such replacements [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Is Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) Illegitimate?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, according to Rule 54 the illegitimacy of Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) [2,3] could be resolved by proposing new combinations for all species currently placed in the genus for which alternative validly published and legitimate names are not yet available [10]. There are several recently published examples of such replacements [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Is Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) Illegitimate?mentioning
confidence: 99%