1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(19)36939-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replacement of the ascending aorta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A low risk of late reinterventions on the proximal aorta could especially be emphasized. In contrast Lytle et al [19] documented significantly inferior late survival following composite graft insertion compared with the replacement of the ascending aorta alone or in combination with separate aortic valve replacement. Except for Marfan or annuloaortic ectasia he recommends avoidance of composite graft implantation in acute dissection.…”
Section: Aortic Root Replacementmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A low risk of late reinterventions on the proximal aorta could especially be emphasized. In contrast Lytle et al [19] documented significantly inferior late survival following composite graft insertion compared with the replacement of the ascending aorta alone or in combination with separate aortic valve replacement. Except for Marfan or annuloaortic ectasia he recommends avoidance of composite graft implantation in acute dissection.…”
Section: Aortic Root Replacementmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Because of the particularity, complexity and high perioperative mortality of cardiac surgery, many models for post-operative complications and mortality risk prediction have been designed. For example, the first surgical risk prediction method used in cardiovascular surgery field, the Parsonnet's score in 1989 [14], due to the existence of related items influenced by subjective judgment of physician, the performance of prediction model is not enough. Similarly, the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) [5], EuroSCORE II updated in 2012 [6], Ontario Province Risk (OPR) established in 1991, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (STS score) [7], and Cleveland model established in 1992 are also widely used scoring systems to predict early and in-hospital mortality in a variety of cardiac surgery, including aortic dissection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a scoring system suitable for patients in developing countries is needed to predict their risk of early death and to guide their choice of further treatment strategies. There have been some risk prediction models for aortic related surgery based on limited sample [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. However, due to inappropriate selection of variables included in the model: most of the models included only medical history and clinical symptoms while not many blood test variables or imaging characteristics was included, their predictive performance is doubtful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several treatment options for ascending aortic aneurysms, and replacement of the ascending aorta with a prosthetic vascular graft is the most common surgical procedure currently performed. This procedure offers good perioperative results, due to remarkable advancements in both CPB and surgical technique; however, the hospital mortality and morbidity rates still remain high, ranging up to 10% [ 5 , 6 ]. For these reasons, many cardiac surgeons have sought to use simple and safe surgical techniques when treating ascending aortic aneurysms along with concomitant cardiac procedures, especially in patients with multiple comorbidities in whom prolonged CPB and aortic cross-clamping time cannot be tolerated [ 1 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%