2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.05.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replacement of A2 and A3 by Pericardium Due to Endocarditis of the Anterior Leaflet of the Mitral Valve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors have reported extensive reconstruction of the mitral valve leaflets and chordae using autologous or bovine pericardium with or without chordal reconstruction for such devastating cases. These reports described only the short- or mid-term results; the long-term outcomes remain unclear because the durability of the pericardial leaflet is still controversial [ 2 5 ]. Furthermore, these reports included repair for chronic endocarditis, whereas repair for active endocarditis may be more challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have reported extensive reconstruction of the mitral valve leaflets and chordae using autologous or bovine pericardium with or without chordal reconstruction for such devastating cases. These reports described only the short- or mid-term results; the long-term outcomes remain unclear because the durability of the pericardial leaflet is still controversial [ 2 5 ]. Furthermore, these reports included repair for chronic endocarditis, whereas repair for active endocarditis may be more challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have reported extensive reconstruction of the mitral valve lea ets and chordae using autologous or bovine pericardium with or without chordal reconstruction for such devastating cases. These reports described only the short-or mid-term results; the long-term outcomes remain unclear because the durability of the pericardial lea et is still controversial [2][3][4][5]. Furthermore, these reports included repair for chronic endocarditis, whereas repair for active endocarditis may be more challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, if vegetation is localized in one scallop MV repair is generally recommended and performed, however, cases with debridement of more than half of the PML or with destruction of more than one segment of the AML remained controversial [9]. Aggressive surgical techniques for the reconstruction of large leaflet defects using patch reconstruction, the sliding technique, and artificial chordae are available [10][11][12], but concerns have been raised about the durability of complex MV repair, particularly during the active-stage of IE. An aggressive approach to repair may render the recurrence of MR a long-term problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%