2019
DOI: 10.5535/arm.2019.43.1.62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Enhances Recovery in Central Cord Syndrome Patients

Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on neurological and functional recovery in patients with central cord syndrome (CCS) involving the upper extremities between the treated and non-treated sides of the treated group and whether the outcomes are comparable to that of the untreated control group.MethodsNineteen CCS patients were treated with high-frequency (20 Hz) rTMS over the motor cortex for 5 days. The stimulation side was randomly selected, and all the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to keep in mind that when targeting the motor cortex (hand, arm, or leg M1), it is very likely to impact additional adjacent and remote connections and areas such as S1 (Belci et al, 2004;Kuppuswamy et al, 2011), due to the extended EF induced by the stimulation. This may explain the effects observed on sensory function (Belci et al, 2004) and the non-targeted side (Gomes-Osman and Field-Fote, 2015;Choi et al, 2019). Such bilateral and sensory effects may be of interest in SCI, given that stimulating the sensory cortex could have also benefit recovery (Pleger et al, 2006).…”
Section: Methods Used To Define and Assess Rtms Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is important to keep in mind that when targeting the motor cortex (hand, arm, or leg M1), it is very likely to impact additional adjacent and remote connections and areas such as S1 (Belci et al, 2004;Kuppuswamy et al, 2011), due to the extended EF induced by the stimulation. This may explain the effects observed on sensory function (Belci et al, 2004) and the non-targeted side (Gomes-Osman and Field-Fote, 2015;Choi et al, 2019). Such bilateral and sensory effects may be of interest in SCI, given that stimulating the sensory cortex could have also benefit recovery (Pleger et al, 2006).…”
Section: Methods Used To Define and Assess Rtms Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The clinical changes were maintained for weeks whereas the electrophysiological changes returned to pretreatment levels at follow-up. Choi et al (2019) specifically tested five sessions of HF-rTMS (20 Hz) in central cord syndrome patients, the most common type of SCI (Choi et al, 2019). They reported improved motor function with increased JTFHT time and scores and muscle strength thus demonstrating once again the potential of HF-rTMS to improve fine motor performance.…”
Section: Upper-extremity Function and Associated Cse Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, there have been enhanced efforts to restore upper limb function in quadriplegia patients due to CNS injury, such as a stroke or SCI. These efforts include various types of exercise therapy, tendon/nerve transfer surgery, electrical stimulation, functional electrical stimulation, upper limb RT, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [31-35]. Among these, upper limb RT is emerging as a promising therapy in CNS injury patients, chiefly because of its advantage in intensive repetitive training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, more and more attention have been paid to the physiological effects of rTMS on brain function. Certain effects have been achieved in the treatment of nervous system diseases such as depression (McClintock et al, 2018), central cord syndrome (Choi et al, 2019), stroke (Unluer et al, 2019), and chronic neuropathic pain (Moisset and Lefaucheur, 2019). Among them, the accuracy of stimulation is the premise of its therapeutic effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%