response to GHRH, insulin, clonidine and arginine after GHRH pretreatment in children. Acta Endocrinol 1992;126:105-8. ISSN 0001-5598 To determine whether differences in the neuroendocrine control of GH are present between children and adult subjects, the GH response to GHRH (1 \g=m\g/kg)(group 1), insulin-induced hypoglycemia (0.1 U/kg iv) (group 2), clonidine (150 \g=m\g/m2 po) (group 3) and iv arginine (0.5 g/kg in 30 min) (group 4) after GHRH pretreatment (1 \g=m\g/kg)was studied in 26 short-stature normal children (mean age 10.2 years). The results were compared with historical data in adults. No differences were present among mean peak GH levels after the first and second stimuli in groups 1, 2 and 3, while in group 4 the GH response to arginine administration was lower than that obtained after the initial GHRH (0.43 \m=+-\0.04 vs 0.9\m=+-\0.13nmol/l). Moreover, comparing the GH peak values following the second stimulus, it appears that the greatest GH responses were elicited by GHRH (1.31 \m=+-\0.23nmol/l) and clonidine (1.11\m=+-\0.22nmol/l), while the lowest was elicited by arginine (0.43\m=+-\0.04nmol/l). In adults, sequential GHRH administration leads to inhibition of the response of the somatotropes, probably mediated by an increase in hypothalamic somatostatin. Our results confirm that after GHRH prestimulation GHRH elicits a significant GH response suggesting that activation of the somatostatinergic tone is less effective in children. This hypothesis also explains the low GH response to arginine which acts selectively through somatostatin inhibition.In the last few years, several authors have demonstrated that the plasma GH response of adult subjects to acute GHRH stimulation is abolished by a previous GHRH injection ( 1, 2). It has been speculated that an increase in the somatostatinergic tone following the first GHRH challenge might be responsible for the pituitary lack of response to the second stimulus. This hypothesis has been further confirmed by studies in which it was shown that pyridostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor capable of reducing the somatostatin¬ ergic tone (3, 4), is effective in reinstating the GH responsiveness to repeated GHRH administration (5). The same mechanism has been advocated to explain the enhanced GH levels after GHRH pretreatment obtained by arginine, another somatostatin inhibiting agent (6), when injected either alone (7) or in combination with the second GHRH bolus (8).On the basis of this evidence, it has been suggested that stimuli eliciting a GH increase after GHRH pretreat¬ ment might act through mechanisms different from GHRH release and most likely involving somatostatin inhibition, as happens after insulin-induced hypogly¬ cemia (1) and, according to some authors (9), after clonidine.On the other hand, children show quite different GH responses to different stimuli. In fact, a persistent somatotrope responsiveness to repeated GHRH stimula¬ tion was demonstrated in this age group, suggesting that a discrete autoregulation of the somatostatin-mediated ...