2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22042072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repetitive Elements in Humans

Abstract: Repetitive DNA in humans is still widely considered to be meaningless, and variations within this part of the genome are generally considered to be harmless to the carrier. In contrast, for euchromatic variation, one becomes more careful in classifying inter-individual differences as meaningless and rather tends to see them as possible influencers of the so-called ‘genetic background’, being able to at least potentially influence disease susceptibilities. Here, the known ‘bad boys’ among repetitive DNAs are re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In eukaryotes, much of the genome is composed of viral elements. For example, the human genome is composed of > 20% LINES and ~ 13% SINES, both of which are repetitive elements derived from retroviruses ( Liehr, 2021 ). In animals, the ARC genes underlying synaptic plasticity required for memory are clearly derived from retroviruses ( Budnik and Thomson, 2020 ) and the mammalian placenta relies on endogenous retroviral elements to function ( Blond et al, 2000 ).…”
Section: Where Do the Undead Viruses Fit Into The Standard Evolutiona...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In eukaryotes, much of the genome is composed of viral elements. For example, the human genome is composed of > 20% LINES and ~ 13% SINES, both of which are repetitive elements derived from retroviruses ( Liehr, 2021 ). In animals, the ARC genes underlying synaptic plasticity required for memory are clearly derived from retroviruses ( Budnik and Thomson, 2020 ) and the mammalian placenta relies on endogenous retroviral elements to function ( Blond et al, 2000 ).…”
Section: Where Do the Undead Viruses Fit Into The Standard Evolutiona...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated total fraction of repetitive sequences in human genome varies from approximately one-half [1] to over two-thirds [2]. While first studies on the human genome size in the 1990s elicited an estimate that the human genome harbored 50,000-100,000 protein-coding genes [3], by 2008, RNA-seq further identified an ocean of non-coding transcribed sequences, divided into long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), antisense RNA and miscellaneous RNA, and finally, in 2018, 20,000 protein-coding genes,~15,000 pseudogenes and, impressively,~17,000-25,500 non-coding RNAs were catalogued [4]. Indeed, the coding RNA (mRNAs) covers merely 1-2% of the genome sequences, whereas a much larger part of the genomes is known to be actively transcribed to produce non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FGF3 -IN2.1 and IN2.2 can be designated as microsatellites, varying (1–6 bp) length stretches of repetitive DNA motifs ( Liehr, 2021 ). They consist of GGAT and GGGT tetra-nucleotides, which in tandem order form a KLF4 K409Q consensus motif ( Figure 4 F) in trans orientation with FGF3 gene transcription.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%