2019
DOI: 10.1109/jiot.2019.2891366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repetitions Versus Retransmissions: Tradeoff in Configuring NB-IoT Random Access Channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, several investigations and solutions have been proposed in the literature. The author in [91] has emphasized the power consumption challenge faced when the eNB received superimposes NPRACH preambles from massive connectivity of multiple users [92] and the different repetitions of preambles for different coverage areas [93] per transmission over channel probabilities due to collision. The authors have analyzed the increment in the average energy consumed, compared to the increase in the number of repetitions, and they propose a novel power-efficient RAP (PE-RAP) to reduce the power consumed by NB-IoT devices in a highly congested environment.…”
Section: Random Access Procedures (Rap)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, several investigations and solutions have been proposed in the literature. The author in [91] has emphasized the power consumption challenge faced when the eNB received superimposes NPRACH preambles from massive connectivity of multiple users [92] and the different repetitions of preambles for different coverage areas [93] per transmission over channel probabilities due to collision. The authors have analyzed the increment in the average energy consumed, compared to the increase in the number of repetitions, and they propose a novel power-efficient RAP (PE-RAP) to reduce the power consumed by NB-IoT devices in a highly congested environment.…”
Section: Random Access Procedures (Rap)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3: RACH success probability for three CE groups versus γ th in the 1st time slot Fig. 3 plots the RACH success probability of a randomly chosen IoT device in the three CE groups in the 1st time slot using (18) and (27) versus the SINR threshold for various repetition values. We first observe a good match between the analysis and the simulation results, which validates the accuracy of the developed mathematical framework.…”
Section: Simulation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 1. The RACH success probability of a randomly chosen IoT device in the CE group 0 in the 1st time slot is derived in (18) at the top of this page with F 0 given in (17).…”
Section: General Single Time Slot Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analytical models of IoT systems have been developed for specific application use cases, like management [26], opportunistic crowd sensing in vehicular scenarios [27], or ambient backscatter devices [28]. Other works have presented theoretical models for the study of networking aspects such as the performance of middleware protocols [29], implemented between the application and the transport layer, or of the random access procedure in NB-IoT [30], [31]. Note, however, that none of the above works investigates the critical role of the EPC control plane in IoT-based systems; indeed few studies exist on the characterization of the overhead and service delay when the EPC handles massive IoT data traffic.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%