1The occipital cortex of early blind individuals (EB) activates during speech processing, 2 challenging the notion of a hard-wired neurobiology of language. But, at what stage of speech 3 processing do occipital regions participate in EB? Here we demonstrate that parieto-occipital 4 regions in EB enhance their synchronization to acoustic fluctuations in human speech in the theta-5 range (corresponding to syllabic rate), irrespective of speech intelligibility. Crucially, enhanced 6 synchronization to the intelligibility of speech was selectively observed in primary visual cortex 7 in EB, suggesting that this region is at the interface between speech perception and 8 comprehension. Moreover, EB showed overall enhanced functional connectivity between 9 temporal and occipital cortices sensitive to speech intelligibility and altered directionality when 10 compared to the sighted group. These findings suggest that the occipital cortex of the blind 11 adopts an architecture allowing the tracking of speech material, and therefore does not fully 12 abstract from the reorganized sensory inputs it receives. 13 14 person's life are among the most challenging and exciting questions in neuroscience research.
18Although there is little debate that both genetic and environmental influences affect brain 19 development, it is currently unknown how these two factors jointly shape the functional 20 architecture of the cortex. A key topic in this debate is the organization of the human language 21 system. Language is commonly thought to engage a well-known network of regions around the 22 lateral sulcus. The consistency of this functional mapping across individuals, as well as its 23 presence early in development are remarkable, and often used as an argument that the 24 neurobiological organization of the human language system is the result of innate constraints 25 (Dehaene-Lambertz et al., 2006; Berwick et al., 2013). Does the existence of a highly consistent 26 set of regions for language acquisition and processing imply that this network is "hardwired" 27 and immutable to change by experience? Strong nativist proposals for linguistic innateness leave 28 little room for plasticity due to experience (Bates, 1999), with for instance the proposition that 29 we should conceive "the growth of language as analogous to the development of a bodily 30 organ" (Chomsky, 1975, p. 11). However, studies in infants born with extensive damage to the 31 typical brain's language areas may develop normal language abilities, demonstrating that the 32 language network is subject to reorganization (Bates, 2005). Perhaps the most intriguing 33 demonstration that the neurobiology of language is susceptible to change due to experience 34 comes from studies in congenitally blind individuals showing functional selectivity to language particularly fascinating since it arises in a system with no injuries of the core language network 38 (Bates, 2005; Atilgan et al., 2017).
39However, the level of speech representation at which the occipital cortex of the early ...