2010
DOI: 10.1186/1758-5996-2-26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repercussions of mild diabetes on pregnancy in Wistar rats and on the fetal development

Abstract: BackgroundExperimental models are necessary to elucidate diabetes pathophysiological mechanisms not yet understood in humans. Objective: To evaluate the repercussions of the mild diabetes, considering two methodologies, on the pregnancy of Wistar rats and on the development of their offspring.MethodsIn the 1st induction, female offspring were distributed into two experimental groups: Group streptozotocin (STZ, n = 67): received the β-cytotoxic agent (100 mg STZ/kg body weight - sc) on the 1st day of the life; … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(42 reference statements)
2
13
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were compatible with those found by Portha et al (1979), who were the first to describe the experimental model for mild-intensity diabetes (100 ≤ glycemia ≤ 300mg/dL) in adult life by using STZ in the neonatal period. In agreement with the present results, other studies showed that mild diabetes could be induced by STZ on the animals first day of birth (Portha and Serradas 1991;Sinzato 2009;Saito et al 2010;Iessi et al 2010). Additionally, this model could also be performed on the postnatal day 2, on the postnatal day 5 (n5-STZ) (Wang et al 1996) and on the 2 nd and 9 th days of life (Ulicná et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These results were compatible with those found by Portha et al (1979), who were the first to describe the experimental model for mild-intensity diabetes (100 ≤ glycemia ≤ 300mg/dL) in adult life by using STZ in the neonatal period. In agreement with the present results, other studies showed that mild diabetes could be induced by STZ on the animals first day of birth (Portha and Serradas 1991;Sinzato 2009;Saito et al 2010;Iessi et al 2010). Additionally, this model could also be performed on the postnatal day 2, on the postnatal day 5 (n5-STZ) (Wang et al 1996) and on the 2 nd and 9 th days of life (Ulicná et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Nevertheless, a number of studies carried out in our laboratory found increased rates of pre-and postimplantation embryo losses and embryonic death (resorption), reduced number of live fetuses, and maternal weight gain during diabetic pregnancy. These alterations are due to metabolic changes caused by hyperglycemic peaks during pregnancy (Kiss et al 2009;Damasceno et al 2011;Iessi et al 2010;Saito et al 2010;Dallaqua et al 2012;Sinzato et al 2012). The divergent results shown in our study, which does not reinforce an effect of diabetes on the reproductive performance of rats, is possibly explained by mating time.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Experimental studies on pregnant rats with mild diabetes (120-300 mg/dL glucose levels) showed a negative impact of this disease on their reproductive performance (Saito et al 2010). In addition, diabetes causes intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), reduces the number of corpus luteum and embryo implantation, and increases the rates of pre-and postimplantation embryo losses (Sinzato et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental results support the notion of hyperglycemia as a teratogen, since high glucose levels (Dienelt and Zur Nieden 2011) or maternal diabetes in vivo as well as exposure to high glucose concentration cause embryonic maldevelopment. Several studies have shown that fetuses from mild diabetic rats have a compromised intrauterine development (Saito et al 2010;Iessi et al 2010) and elevated oxidative stress, contributing to an increased incidence of skeletal and visceral malformations at birth .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%