2017
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggx169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeating Marmara Sea earthquakes: indication for fault creep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Repeating earthquakes have been observed between the WH and Central Basin on the western side of the Sea of Marmara. Bohnhoff et al (2017) suggested that the eastern part will be locked because of no repeating earthquakes. Bohnhoff et al (2017) suggested that the eastern part will be locked because of no repeating earthquakes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Repeating earthquakes have been observed between the WH and Central Basin on the western side of the Sea of Marmara. Bohnhoff et al (2017) suggested that the eastern part will be locked because of no repeating earthquakes. Bohnhoff et al (2017) suggested that the eastern part will be locked because of no repeating earthquakes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical Research Letters appeared in repeating earthquake activity; some studies (Bohnhoff et al, 2017;Schmittbuhl et al, 2016;Uchida et al, 2018) reported that repeating earthquakes are found from the Western High (WH) to the Central Basin, indicating fault creep on the western part.…”
Section: 1029/2018gl080984mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1b and 1c); this section experienced the last ground-rupturing events in 1509 and 1766, suggesting that the fault is mature 5 and a ground-rupturing event might be expected (Ambraseys, 2002;Barka et al, 2002;Parsons, 2004;Janssen et al 2009;Murru et al, 2016;Bohnhoff et al, 2016a;2016b;2017b). There, the potential for a large seismic event is regarded as being high (Bohnhoff et al, 2013;2017b). A key question is if this 150-km-long seismic gap will rupture in the future in one event or in several separate events due to the segmentation, an issue that will depend a lot on the stress evolution along strike among other forcing factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The Marmara section of the NAFZ, considered to be a 150-km-long seismic gap between the ruptures of two big events in 1912 (M 7.3) and 1999a (M 7.4), is a zone of strong earthquakes (M ~ 7.4) with a recurrence time of approximately 250 years ( Fig. 1b and 1c); this section experienced the last ground-rupturing events in 1509 and 1766, suggesting that the fault is mature 5 and a ground-rupturing event might be expected (Ambraseys, 2002;Barka et al, 2002;Parsons, 2004;Janssen et al 2009;Murru et al, 2016;Bohnhoff et al, 2016a;2016b;2017b). There, the potential for a large seismic event is regarded as being high (Bohnhoff et al, 2013;2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%