2024
DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00073-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeatedly experiencing the McGurk effect induces long-lasting changes in auditory speech perception

John F. Magnotti,
Anastasia Lado,
Yue Zhang
et al.

Abstract: In the McGurk effect, presentation of incongruent auditory and visual speech evokes a fusion percept different than either component modality. We show that repeatedly experiencing the McGurk effect for 14 days induces a change in auditory-only speech perception: the auditory component of the McGurk stimulus begins to evoke the fusion percept, even when presented on its own without accompanying visual speech. This perceptual change, termed fusion-induced recalibration (FIR), was talker-specific and syllable-spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible concern is confounding of talker differences and syllable content. This concern was mitigated by the fact that the stimulus set contained examples of both pairings recorded from the same talkers ( Magnotti et al, 2024 ). For talker Audrey Nath, the ApaVka pairing evoked 72% fusion responses while AbaVga evoked 6% fusion responses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A possible concern is confounding of talker differences and syllable content. This concern was mitigated by the fact that the stimulus set contained examples of both pairings recorded from the same talkers ( Magnotti et al, 2024 ). For talker Audrey Nath, the ApaVka pairing evoked 72% fusion responses while AbaVga evoked 6% fusion responses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To sample currently available McGurk stimuli, 15 different stimuli (s1–s15) were collected from popular online demonstrations and previously published studies ( Table 1 ). Previous in-person and online studies presented many of the same stimuli ( Basu Mallick et al, 2015 ; Magnotti et al, 2015 , 2024 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stimulus set consisted of 15 McGurk videos, each containing the incongruent pairing of auditory ba with visual ga (AbaVga, AbabaVgaga) or auditory pa and visual ka (ApaVka, ApapaVkaka) (McGurk and MacDonald, 1976). The stimulus set was the same as in the original description of the NED model (Magnotti and Beauchamp, 2015) with an additional recording of ApapaVkaka recorded by Arnt Maasø, as described in (Magnotti et al, 2024). There were 8 male talkers and 7 female talkers; two talkers (1 M and 1F) were native Japanese speakers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible concern is confounding of talker differences and syllable content. This concern was mitigated by the fact that the stimulus set contained examples of both pairings recorded from the same talkers (Magnotti et al, 2024). For talker Audrey Nath, the pa/ka pairing evoked 72% fusion responses while ba/ga evoked 6% fusion responses.…”
Section: Stimulus Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%