2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated Tobacco-Use Screening and Intervention in Clinical Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
3
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Screening and brief advice on tobacco dependence is one of the three most cost-effective medical interventions (Solberg, Maciosek, Edwards, Khanchandani, & Goodman, 2006). However, doctors seldom advised or helped smokers to quit, and this situation did not change between 1996 and 2006.…”
Section: Physiciansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening and brief advice on tobacco dependence is one of the three most cost-effective medical interventions (Solberg, Maciosek, Edwards, Khanchandani, & Goodman, 2006). However, doctors seldom advised or helped smokers to quit, and this situation did not change between 1996 and 2006.…”
Section: Physiciansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such diseases, they are accepted as gold standard treatments in terms of cost effectiveness [20][21][22][23]. Moreover, more premature births can be prevented by the treatment of smoker pregnant women for cessation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although evidencebased guidelines for delivering smoking cessation treatments (medications and counseling) in primary care settings constitute standard care [9][10][11] and increase the likelihood of smoking cessation, 9 delivery of these services among healthcare providers remains low. [12][13][14][15] Given the number of smokers served in primary care 9 and particularly in CHCs, the medical costs of smoking-related illnesses, 2 and the availability of interventions that are among the most cost-effective in healthcare, 16 smoking cessation assistance should be a priority for all healthcare providers. This study is registered as an observational study at clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT02355132).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%