2018
DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_35_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated penile girth enhancement with biodegradable scaffolds: Microscopic ultrastructural analysis and surgical benefits

Abstract: Autologous tissue engineering using biodegradable scaffolds as a carrier is a well-known procedure for penile girth enhancement. We evaluated a group of previously treated patients with the aim to analyze histomorphometric changes after tissue remodeling and to estimate the benefits of repeated procedure. Between February 2012 and December 2016, a group of 21 patients, aged 22–37 (mean 28.0) years, underwent a repeated penile girth enhancement procedure with biodegradable scaffolds. Procedure included insertio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interesting prospects come from the biodegradable scaffolds for the generation of new layers of tissue. Despite the excellent results demonstrated through histological analysis of the tissues formed [ 91 ], tissue engineering is expensive, complex, and invasive compared to soft tissue fillers. Additionally, evidence is still limited to few case reports, and we are far from being able to draw conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Interesting prospects come from the biodegradable scaffolds for the generation of new layers of tissue. Despite the excellent results demonstrated through histological analysis of the tissues formed [ 91 ], tissue engineering is expensive, complex, and invasive compared to soft tissue fillers. Additionally, evidence is still limited to few case reports, and we are far from being able to draw conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… STUDIES n Age (years) Pre-operatory GIRTH THERAPY POST- OPERATORY GIRTH SATISFACTION COMPLICATIONS SOFT TISSUE FILLERS Kwak et al 2010 41 42.5 At midshaft 7.48 (SD 0. 35) cm 20.56 ml of HA +3.92, SD 0.25 cm (1 month) +3.78, SD 0.26 cm (18 month) 18 months 100% patients satisfied (VAS) Not reported Casavantes et al 2015 203 37 Mid 10.54 (SD 1.49) cm 20 ml PMMA Base 13 (SD 1.46) cm Mid 12.76 (SD 1.41) cm 83%patients satisfied (grade 8–10) -Nodules (52%) -Sensitivity decreased (2%) -Erectile function decreased (1.5%) GRAFTS Spyropoulos et al [ 82 ] 5 30 Subcoronal 6.0 (SD 0.4) cm Autologous Dermal fat graft Base + 2.3, SD 0.25 cm Subcoronal +2.6, SD 0.25 cm 7.54 (Post operatory APPSSI) -Curvature with pain (25%) -Pain on erection and hypertrophic scar formation (75%) Alei et al [ 86 ] 60 28.2 Flaccid 8.1 cm Porcine dermal acellular matrix graft Flaccid 11.3 cm Erect 13.2 cm 98% patients satisfied (Post operatory APPSSI) -Moderate fibrosis with minor retractions (6.21%) -Suture dehiscent (5.58%) BIODEGRADABLE SCAFFOLDS Djordjevic et al [ 91 ] 21 28 Flaccid 11.6 (SD 0.8) cm PLGA scaffold + Fibroblasts Flaccid + 1.1, SD 0.4 cm Erect +1.0, SD 0.3 cm 100% patients satisfied (Mark 3–5) -Partial superficial necrosis (10%) Zhe Jin et al 2010 69 33 Flaccid 8.18 (SD 0.83) cm Erect STUDIES ...…”
Section: Invasive Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations