1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf01389458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated modifications of limitk-periodic continued fractions

Abstract: Summary. The advantages of using modified approximants for continued fractions, can be enhanced by repeating the modification process. If K(a,/b,) is limit k-periodic, a natural choice for the modifying factors is a k-periodic sequence of right or wrong tails of the corresponding k-periodic continued fraction, if it exists. If the modified approximants thus obtained are ordinary approximants of a new limit k-periodic continued fraction, we repeat the process, if possible. Some examples where this process is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the third paragraph we give some examples where we use our method to calculate minimal solutions of linear homogeneous second-order recurrence relations (see [I, 5, 11]). In the fourth paragraph we prove that the method is equivalent to repeated applications of the Bauer-Muir transformation, and in this sense it is related to the idea developed by Jacobsen in [2]. Finally in the last paragraph we generalize these ideas to non-homogeneous recurrence relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the third paragraph we give some examples where we use our method to calculate minimal solutions of linear homogeneous second-order recurrence relations (see [I, 5, 11]). In the fourth paragraph we prove that the method is equivalent to repeated applications of the Bauer-Muir transformation, and in this sense it is related to the idea developed by Jacobsen in [2]. Finally in the last paragraph we generalize these ideas to non-homogeneous recurrence relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A continued fraction (2) converges to w~. It is then possible to prove (Thron and Waadeland [12]) that the modified approximants S.(wl.))…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We also call (4.3) a TW-transformation of (1.1) with respect to {w n } [17,19,20,27]. This transform can be used repeatedly, that is, we can apply the Bauer-Muir transformation repeatedly to the new continued fraction bi + f (i) for the (i + 1)th iteration, i = 0, 1, 2, .…”
Section: Bauer-muir Transformations On the Continued Fractions Frommentioning
confidence: 99%