2020
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-015938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated mechanical thrombectomy in short-term large vessel occlusion recurrence: multicenter study and systematic review of the literature

Abstract: BackgroundData on the frequency and outcome of repeated mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with short-term re-occlusion of intracranial vessels is limited. Addressing this subject, we report our multicenter experience with a systematic review of the literature.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted of consecutive acute stroke patients treated with MT repeatedly within 30 days at 10 tertiary care centers between January 2007 and January 2020. Baseline demographics, etiology of stroke, angiographic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, COVID-19 patients with stroke tend to have an elevated incidence of potentially fatal thrombotic complications that could have contributed to the increased risk of death 12. Indeed, we found a noticeably higher rate of re-occlusion within 30 days compared with a previous analysis of non-infected patients (4.5% vs 0.4%) 24. Re-occlusions might be promoted by a prothrombotic state, antiphospholipid syndrome, cytokine storm or other coagulopathies—factors that have already been described with COVID-19 and related stroke pathogenesis 25 26…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, COVID-19 patients with stroke tend to have an elevated incidence of potentially fatal thrombotic complications that could have contributed to the increased risk of death 12. Indeed, we found a noticeably higher rate of re-occlusion within 30 days compared with a previous analysis of non-infected patients (4.5% vs 0.4%) 24. Re-occlusions might be promoted by a prothrombotic state, antiphospholipid syndrome, cytokine storm or other coagulopathies—factors that have already been described with COVID-19 and related stroke pathogenesis 25 26…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…12 Indeed, we found a noticeably higher rate of re-occlusion within 30 days compared with a previous analysis of non-infected patients (4.5% vs 0.4%). 24 Re-occlusions might be promoted by a prothrombotic state, antiphospholipid syndrome, cytokine storm or other coagulopathies-factors that have already been described with COVID-19 and related stroke pathogenesis. 25 26 Notably, patients with subsided COVID-19 infection tend to have a better clinical outcome than patients with acute COVID-19 infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are procedure-related complications like dissection and stent thrombosis. 22 These complications were infrequent in our cohort. The primary cause for rLVO in our cohort was cardioembolic source, about 56% of the 54 patients, with majority due to atrial fibrillation (77%).…”
Section: Clinical and Population Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Similar and slightly lower rates (0.4%-1.5%) have been previously reported in smaller series. 9,[19][20][21][22] These infrequent treatment rates likely represent an underestimate of the actual number of rLVO due to: exclusion of patients with rLVO with severe disability, patients presenting with rLVO to different hospitals, and missed rLVO during hospitalization in patients with a subtle worsening of the original NIHSS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are emerging prospective data to suggest that in the cryptogenic stroke population, LVO is independently associated with covert paroxysmal AF [16]. There is also a higher incidence of cardioembolic aetiology in LVO re currence [17]. Although risk factors for ischaemic stroke are well known, the cause remains undefined in 25-39% of patients who experience an acute event, even with full diagnostic evaluation [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%