2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2010007500042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated exposure of adolescent rats to oral methylphenidate does not induce behavioral sensitization or cross-sensitization to nicotine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study designed to evaluate the cardiovascular impact of a less prolonged exposure (3 weeks) of mice to pollution showed no differences in the studied variables (blood pressure, heart rate, heart rate variability and baroreflex response to nitroprusside stimulus) between the exposed and non-exposed group 52 . Justo et al 53 evaluated in young rats, whether the use of stimulant drugs such as methylphenidate (MPH), could facilitate the nicotine addiction, as suggested by some studies in humans. However, the study did not show cross-sensitization, suggesting that the MPH treatment did not induce neuroadaptation in rats that could increase sensitivity to nicotine.…”
Section: Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study designed to evaluate the cardiovascular impact of a less prolonged exposure (3 weeks) of mice to pollution showed no differences in the studied variables (blood pressure, heart rate, heart rate variability and baroreflex response to nitroprusside stimulus) between the exposed and non-exposed group 52 . Justo et al 53 evaluated in young rats, whether the use of stimulant drugs such as methylphenidate (MPH), could facilitate the nicotine addiction, as suggested by some studies in humans. However, the study did not show cross-sensitization, suggesting that the MPH treatment did not induce neuroadaptation in rats that could increase sensitivity to nicotine.…”
Section: Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several of these studies injected MP either subcutaneously or intraperitoneally, which differs significantly from oral administration, specifically with respect to time to peak serum concentration, half-life, and rate of elimination (Kuczenski and Segal, 2001), as well as absolute magnitude and time course of increases in extracellular DA and locomotor responses (Gerasimov et al, 2000; Kuczenski and Segal, 2001). Studies that have used oral dosing have done so by gavage (Kuczenski and Segal, 2001; Justo et al, 2010), which is stressful and can cause injury (Brown et al, 2000; Balcombe et al, 2004), or by administering MP on an oyster cracker or by mixing with chow (LeBlanc-Duchin and Taukulis, 2007; Zhu et al, 2010). Although the latter is less stressful and dangerous, oral administration results in peak serum concentration 15 min post-administration, and this concentration has been shown to drop by half within an additional 5 min (Patrick et al, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, many studies that have aimed to explore the effects of oral MP utilize the gavage method (Kuczenski and Segal, 2002; Justo et al, 2010), which can result in a significant stress response, as well as aspiration, and/or pulmonary injury in rats (Brown et al, 2000; Balcombe et al, 2004). Other studies have utilized voluntary oral consumption of MP (administered on oyster crackers or mixed with chow) to avoid these issues (LeBlanc-Duchin and Taukulis, 2007; Zhu et al, 2010); however, these methods also have some limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%