2017
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated cervical length measurements for the verification of short cervical length

Abstract: Among patients with singleton pregnancies, verification of short cervical length did not improve the identification of short cervical length.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies advocate for dynamic cervical examination regardless of whether a subject is highor low-risk [50,51]. On the other hand, a greater number of studies either oppose or do not recommend large-scale cervical screening, for reasons that include but are not limited to the material cost, the time required, the lack of unified standards, and the professional training of laboratory personnel [13,14,[52][53][54][55], which may lead to costs that do not conform to health economics. The prediction model in this study effectively predicts the early development of preterm labor based on demographic factors and prenatal laboratory data.…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies advocate for dynamic cervical examination regardless of whether a subject is highor low-risk [50,51]. On the other hand, a greater number of studies either oppose or do not recommend large-scale cervical screening, for reasons that include but are not limited to the material cost, the time required, the lack of unified standards, and the professional training of laboratory personnel [13,14,[52][53][54][55], which may lead to costs that do not conform to health economics. The prediction model in this study effectively predicts the early development of preterm labor based on demographic factors and prenatal laboratory data.…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%