1961
DOI: 10.1159/000304168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated Applanation Tonometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
37
1

Year Published

1966
1966
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, a thinner cornea results in underestimation of IOP, because of the ease of applanating. Increased corneal thickness due to edema, however, may lead to underestimation of the IOP [57,[61][62][63][64][65][66]. The IOP measurement of failing grafts may be falsely low due to corneal edema ( Fig.…”
Section: Pachymetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, a thinner cornea results in underestimation of IOP, because of the ease of applanating. Increased corneal thickness due to edema, however, may lead to underestimation of the IOP [57,[61][62][63][64][65][66]. The IOP measurement of failing grafts may be falsely low due to corneal edema ( Fig.…”
Section: Pachymetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have all been compared with the Goldmann applanation tonometer, which has been considered the current standard method [7,25,26]. When comparing tonometry devices, sequence randomization of measurement methods is necessary because each previous measurement lowers the IOP by 0.1-0.4 mmHg [13,14]. Therefore, this study sought to randomize the application sequence of Goldmann and TGDc-01 assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, the clinical situation seems different, and there is evidence that other factors could possibly affect measurement of IOP, such as respiration [12], blinking [20], vertical eye movements [13], or accommodation on the part of the subjects [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%