2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.10.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeatability of the modified Oxford foot model during gait in healthy adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
78
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
78
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…During walking skin movement and furthermore detachment of the CEPG were recognized. These problems might be related to the high inter-subject variance for the hindfoot-tibia motion mainly in the frontal plane, which was found in this study, and which has also been reported by previous studies [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…During walking skin movement and furthermore detachment of the CEPG were recognized. These problems might be related to the high inter-subject variance for the hindfoot-tibia motion mainly in the frontal plane, which was found in this study, and which has also been reported by previous studies [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The investigator attached 2 rigid plastic plates of markers to the participant's shank using tape prewrap and attached 28 individual 9.5-mm reflective markers (MoCap Solutions, Huntington Beach, CA) using double-sided adhesive tape at specific anatomical landmarks. Marker placement was according to the Oxford foot model 22,23 : The examiner attached anatomical markers bilaterally on the lateral and medial femoral epicondyles, lateral and medial malleoli, proximal and distal fifth metatarsals, distal second metatarsals, proximal and distal first metatarsals, and lateral, medial and posterior calcanei. The Oxford foot model method is reliable for calculating adult hindfoot motion (ICC ¼ 0.90-0.97, SEM 90 ¼ 0.898-2.218).…”
Section: Range Of Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Oxford foot model method is reliable for calculating adult hindfoot motion (ICC ¼ 0.90-0.97, SEM 90 ¼ 0.898-2.218). 22 The participant stood in the capture volume in anatomical position as a static calibration trial was captured. For all data capture, a 12-camera Vicon MX motion-monitoring system using Nexus 1.4 software (Oxford Metrics Group, Oxford, UK) collected the 3-dimensional location of the reflective markers at 100 Hz.…”
Section: Range Of Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone models were obtained from previous researches of our research group [17]. In recent researches, foot has been widely modelled as multiple segments while the number of the segments range from 2 to 4 [18][19][20][21][22]. This paper has divided the foot into 4 parts: rear-foot composed of calcaneus and talus, mid-foot composed of navicular, cuneiforms, cuboid, fore-mid foot consisted of first to fifth metatarsal, fore-foot composed of phalanges.…”
Section: Multi-segment Foot Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%