2001
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200111000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeatability of Lung Density Measurements with Low-Dose Computed Tomography in Subjects with α-1-Antitrypsin Deficiency–Associated Emphysema

Abstract: Lung density parameters of emphysema derived by MSCT provide an opportunity for analysis of the treatment effects of new drugs on the progression of emphysema.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
57
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…27 The percentile approach may be more robust for longitudinal evaluation of emphysema, and less sensitive to change in lung volumes. [28][29][30] The first percentile value is optimal for correlation with histology. 26 However, because of concern regarding artifact from image noise and truncation artifact at the first percentile level, most studies have used the 15th percentile threshold.…”
Section: Emphysemamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…27 The percentile approach may be more robust for longitudinal evaluation of emphysema, and less sensitive to change in lung volumes. [28][29][30] The first percentile value is optimal for correlation with histology. 26 However, because of concern regarding artifact from image noise and truncation artifact at the first percentile level, most studies have used the 15th percentile threshold.…”
Section: Emphysemamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 However, because of concern regarding artifact from image noise and truncation artifact at the first percentile level, most studies have used the 15th percentile threshold. 30,31 It is important to remember that the measurement of the percentage of low attenuation areas (%LAA), while it correlates moderately well with histologic severity of emphysema (with r values between 0.5 and 0.6), is not a direct measurement of emphysema. The term percentage of emphysema (% emphysema) is widely used to refer to such CT measurements, but is imprecise and may give rise to confusion.…”
Section: Emphysemamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of a four detector row MDCT, four transverse images of nominal slice thickness can be obtained per 360u rotation [9]. Current four row MDCT, depending on the manufacturer, can obtain four 1 mm or four 1.25 mm images of nominal slice thickness of both lungs in a single breath-hold, 25-30 s; eight row MDCT scanners achieve this in 10 s and 16 row MDCT can achieve this in 5 s. MDCT has shown excellent repeatability of measurement of emphysema in patients scanned 2 weeks apart [10].…”
Section: Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of concerns regarding increased image artifacts and noise at the first percentile level, the 15th percentile threshold is most commonly used (8,10). The percentile index has been reported to be more robust for evaluating longitudinal variations in emphysema, and as being less sensitive to lung volume changes (8,11).…”
Section: Emphysema Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%