2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05579-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeatability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and agreement with other three optical biometers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Huang et al 11 used OA2000 to measure the biological parameters of normal subjects and compared it with the PCIbased IOLMaster, which proved that OA-2000 had good repeatability and reproducibility for the biological parameters of healthy eyes. Previous studies proved that OA-2000 and IOLMaster show high consistency in most biometric parameters of normal subjects 12,13 . What is the accuracy of biological parameters obtained with the OA-2000 for SO-lled eyes?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Huang et al 11 used OA2000 to measure the biological parameters of normal subjects and compared it with the PCIbased IOLMaster, which proved that OA-2000 had good repeatability and reproducibility for the biological parameters of healthy eyes. Previous studies proved that OA-2000 and IOLMaster show high consistency in most biometric parameters of normal subjects 12,13 . What is the accuracy of biological parameters obtained with the OA-2000 for SO-lled eyes?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Huang et al 10 used OA2000 to measure the biological parameters of normal subjects and compared it with the PCIbased IOLMaster, which proved that OA-2000 had good repeatability and reproducibility for the biological parameters including AL, anterior chamber depth (ACD), keratometry (K), lens thickness, and corneal diameter values. Previous studies proved that OA-2000 and IOLMaster showed high intra-session consistency in most biometric parameters (including AL [11][12][13] , K 12,13 , ACD 12 ) of normal subjects. Reitblat et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This within‐subject SD is derived from a one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) as the square root of the within‐groups mean square 1 . Repeatability for AL ranged from 4 to 50 μm with a median value of 12 μm; for central corneal thickness (CCT) repeatability it was found to be between 0.7 and 20.3 μm with a median of 2.8 μm; for anterior chamber depth/aqueous depth (ACD/AQD) within‐subject SD ranged from 3 to 134 μm with a median of 20 μm and for keratometry (mean K) repeatability ranged from 0.01 dioptres (D) to 0.21 D with a median of 0.09 D. These investigations studied healthy subjects (from 19 to 91 years old) or those prior to cataract surgery, comprised between 29 and 119 subjects per study 2–27 and included one meta‐analysis 28 . Additionally, we refer to a recent review of ocular biometry using SS‐OCT by Montés‐Micó 29 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%